From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id gCOECgjUz1+ZaQAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 08 Dec 2020 19:29:12 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0 with LMTPS id 2Kt1BgjUz19gAwAA1q6Kng (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 08 Dec 2020 19:29:12 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E418894030E for ; Tue, 8 Dec 2020 19:29:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:49710 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kmife-0001Da-QT for larch@yhetil.org; Tue, 08 Dec 2020 14:29:10 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:41290) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kmiGL-0001UN-0I for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Dec 2020 14:03:01 -0500 Received: from mira.cbaines.net ([212.71.252.8]:37290) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kmiGG-0005xH-KF; Tue, 08 Dec 2020 14:03:00 -0500 Received: from localhost (188.29.103.89.threembb.co.uk [188.29.103.89]) by mira.cbaines.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 35E3D27BC01; Tue, 8 Dec 2020 19:02:52 +0000 (GMT) Received: from capella (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 2a93cf7d; Tue, 8 Dec 2020 19:02:49 +0000 (UTC) References: <87v9dcv8mt.fsf@gnu.org> User-agent: mu4e 1.4.13; emacs 27.1 From: Christopher Baines To: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Subject: Re: New =?utf-8?B?4oCcdW5ncmFmdGluZ+KAnQ==?= branch In-reply-to: <87v9dcv8mt.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2020 19:02:47 +0000 Message-ID: <87ft4gi0iw.fsf@cbaines.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Received-SPF: pass client-ip=212.71.252.8; envelope-from=mail@cbaines.net; helo=mira.cbaines.net X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -4.41 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: E418894030E X-Spam-Score: -4.41 X-Migadu-Scanner: ns3122888.ip-94-23-21.eu X-TUID: PhsJ7UPfmNPq --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Ludovic Court=C3=A8s writes: > Following discussions on IRC, I=E2=80=99ve created a new =E2=80=98ungraft= ing=E2=80=99 branch > that does nothing but ungraft things. > > The rationale is that grafts incur additional overhead when installing > things (the time to create those grafts), so it=E2=80=99s good to clean t= hem up > once in a while. Ungrafting in a dedicated branch means we know the > branch is =E2=80=9Csafe=E2=80=9D, unlike more exploratory branches like = =E2=80=98staging=E2=80=99 and > =E2=80=98core-updates=E2=80=99. > > The plan is to start building it later today, and to hopefully be done > in a week or so. > > Thoughts? Sounds good. I'm not quite sure what you mean by safe though, it's definitely likely that things will behave the same, but it's not certain. Additionally, I guess there will be cases were things fail to build when the replacement is used in the build process. I thought the process used to be to push the update to staging/core-updates when the replacement was introduced to master? --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQKlBAEBCgCPFiEEPonu50WOcg2XVOCyXiijOwuE9XcFAl/PzddfFIAAAAAALgAo aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldDNF ODlFRUU3NDU4RTcyMEQ5NzU0RTBCMjVFMjhBMzNCMEI4NEY1NzcRHG1haWxAY2Jh aW5lcy5uZXQACgkQXiijOwuE9XeWEg//TzVczbaWAcna7gIKqLXj9dhDCBxYoJcz oDXEgS1sTiR8U/ccShYYx6H9a5/YXqOiiWlWFqkpKDrUV/Sk6ih5IKWrRAHqXY+K icDJAXPpV/YlnrrUFywXKxoPlx7O//+j3C0cUBbn0Z1o4L/PO+yvJoRcHfwUpxgj eMKgoEA/DNuinHMOzdm8U/aMixJRoYrQavoyHIVhvYKRVgfvMZ/YWFj+ds1UtWik Vt7gfrSheBTUPjIlJxjijCB23OWcslQyaaxssn3GAxyb3O7lYhUIVxMcaTUU75X1 hIQIshWboKzU0hJqmjJqKdqVDzbVoqBNPMfxXir7OUyoEQDvXG+LV2Jdo/3rMl3i FXSvSW9EfG5OIZ2uv8bvYqADKelMkoThTtMpAGP8OnDFxjtat8jsvVwchG6ZxGnS TAjfpOuZSAVxUw2tnFPJsflqOQSLZKrHwUQmc3DMqfvaFpa+/X+zCChBelPmIIpZ 0NJsg/+vq9hm+x9+Ak/nrZ3dZqjJ2nzaLE2XP2fYI01c67NYYiE7XWGSDVcKyaLf GpGVoLYdCPhoSm53P4fvidezXAX8Usvb6w+X6FCfCiGenX+xj9q+50vwu5EfwXkW 86KEVBSL87t8pqd+q5utWr+MYxEnpXOd2/7CwZNqeCJPDUTaoz2HzABTHJunhTWk DDAlC2xmFCg= =zSf1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--