From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms0.migadu.com with LMTPS id GN7qLR6/i2AcfAAAgWs5BA (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 10:26:06 +0200 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id cEaOKR6/i2DlZwAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 08:26:06 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 74F56160D8 for ; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 10:26:06 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1]:37538 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lcOTN-0001KS-MF for larch@yhetil.org; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 04:26:05 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:38306) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lcOTK-0001KM-K6 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 04:26:02 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:45887) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lcOTK-0001sF-D8 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 04:26:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lcOTK-0005IU-9m for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 04:26:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#47661] [PATCH 00/33] Improve Emacs UX. Resent-From: Xinglu Chen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2021 08:26:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 47661 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: Leo Prikler , 47661@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 47661-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B47661.161977113920335 (code B ref 47661); Fri, 30 Apr 2021 08:26:02 +0000 Received: (at 47661) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Apr 2021 08:25:39 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57433 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lcOSw-0005Hv-UJ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 04:25:39 -0400 Received: from h87-96-130-155.cust.a3fiber.se ([87.96.130.155]:38236 helo=mail.yoctocell.xyz) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lcOSv-0005Hg-J0 for 47661@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 04:25:38 -0400 From: Xinglu Chen DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=yoctocell.xyz; s=mail; t=1619771132; bh=MCLzQqpTpq1++FdRJS4fGBSIOts13oRNZ/bFtQEudK8=; h=From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=FCiL/ZVeT2s+UOfd/XSY5YplnjvzqtMwcb125A1davcidxECS+of9Ur/HdWGzQglM 4+o8oehBD8U4WqREUJcBJpOMe5O2sAClumgZKod2pSpIhReEmf9CZ7C96EXVfcSAMZ jq8rP3auej7Pbn8QnLkVSgMC6n1sqHulLYr9S8QY= In-Reply-To: <040332f67d721597f7885e4605259b8d562d29be.camel@student.tugraz.at> References: <20210408174616.13112-1-leo.prikler@student.tugraz.at> <87v985uvz9.fsf@yoctocell.xyz> <040332f67d721597f7885e4605259b8d562d29be.camel@student.tugraz.at> Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2021 10:25:29 +0200 Message-ID: <87fsz8npqe.fsf@yoctocell.xyz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1619771166; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:resent-cc:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references: list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post: dkim-signature; bh=r0IUp5Lvz1v0xNun1cgSpZgKFzXTEhVZ8ZAjnCxt0NY=; b=ih4HyYoCCSP1AuA9hdk7g1XaeTb5r5tiPXwVynMDmtrN9yYMeyINleRDDzLRo+BT1vxdkd feTnGgqisUy3QNfHyEmulzvO5lHiIqKbhW5l3/fAeoXOxoFnUpWoUyID+gIY3xXSNJ5jVK euyETPjsdgt7zAfBXevW1FqbdA0QwA+wAXXnliUix79gr8O7+oKB5PJSAhdACuqLomiSvr oXD9+kxv+zwoH3xmV/7nnlKMflBVG7l1wDbEzFbn5HJ8lZ9nhkjrEgkE6xgs1fmvHK7X7F ehcnzjvRwFAJ4D0hiPdIy6FG8SrW6U9mo9QEMpQfBF5WI3ObBTFJk0MKqVobdQ== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1619771166; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=LDbiNWrsw/wi0+IIh3O4czc5CK3Wihnn9z8GYpEv+Joasvrcy5J7U8e3dggtjm+kVYAhTs dQ5clQGRsHO6irJGBW7rwTd1bSnhx3tGQ31ZCzHSl0NDeZXHJ9MB7mXl/MLNi0UImmXOLB fV7a6cT6vJg7kcSlN4mW4cBlLj7OjnYRYsB5Cf2uMVfy2vlrxdh5dvqtExt0tCNjwTWOj7 duEBl6WE57WI8EYxUg9JNJa3L7l+JtKAXzg9wI8ECuPpO9SI+NENd41clNQMoQMgf0FTSM YCH8CpOBhRQqKyS+fmk/M+JNn8654r2YOTQIQuLx8B0IcTmqd+5yaclaNqvKaw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=yoctocell.xyz header.s=mail header.b="FCiL/ZVe"; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=yoctocell.xyz (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Spam-Score: 0.14 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=yoctocell.xyz header.s=mail header.b="FCiL/ZVe"; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=yoctocell.xyz (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 74F56160D8 X-Spam-Score: 0.14 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-TUID: RB3pN8sEdxQB On Thu, Apr 29 2021, Leo Prikler wrote: >> Out of curiosity, what are the differences between v2 and v1 of the >> series? It would be nice to include a cover letter for v2 to give an >> overview of the changes since v1. > The difference of v2 w.r.t. v1 lies in how Emacs finds core binaries > ([03/33] in the respective series). v1 hardcodes them, but as I > feared, that won't work with tramp, so I changed it to adjusting PATH > in v2. You can test that this has a visible effect by checking some > variant of emacs-next both with v1 and v2. Ok, thanks for explaining.