From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp2 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms0.migadu.com with LMTPS id YMZ2F7cORmEo1wAAgWs5BA (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 18 Sep 2021 18:07:19 +0200 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2 with LMTPS id CGMdE7cORmGLJQAAB5/wlQ (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 18 Sep 2021 16:07:19 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BB1D198E6 for ; Sat, 18 Sep 2021 18:07:18 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1]:47774 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mRcs1-0005n0-OD for larch@yhetil.org; Sat, 18 Sep 2021 12:07:17 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:36284) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mRcrn-0005gk-Sd for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Sep 2021 12:07:04 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:53177) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mRcrm-0006hZ-QU for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Sep 2021 12:07:03 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mRcrm-00043h-AX for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Sep 2021 12:07:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#50597: different fixed-output when using =?UTF-8?Q?=E2=80=99--with-source=E2=80=99?= transformation Resent-From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2021 16:07:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 50597 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: zimoun Received: via spool by 50597-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B50597.163198121115585 (code B ref 50597); Sat, 18 Sep 2021 16:07:02 +0000 Received: (at 50597) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Sep 2021 16:06:51 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36490 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mRcrb-00043J-Iv for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 18 Sep 2021 12:06:51 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:47404) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mRcrW-000432-Lu for 50597@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 18 Sep 2021 12:06:50 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:56266) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mRcrR-0006PI-BR; Sat, 18 Sep 2021 12:06:41 -0400 Received: from [2a01:e0a:1d:7270:af76:b9b:ca24:c465] (port=35810 helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mRcrR-00089w-2E; Sat, 18 Sep 2021 12:06:41 -0400 From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= References: <86zgsecrzv.fsf@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2021 18:06:38 +0200 In-Reply-To: <86zgsecrzv.fsf@gmail.com> (zimoun's message of "Wed, 15 Sep 2021 07:44:36 +0200") Message-ID: <87fsu1uaup.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: 50597@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1631981238; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:resent-cc: resent-from:resent-sender:resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post; bh=udU+8ys8O4iMDe6c5CGrOKyU4p7k+ogwtQjQf6UKdNo=; b=fjbB0MohHlbuHQsngiCIIMWcm3m0fLBbVwrHraqwP+LyeEJv/XYRal6enQVlr2hE9C1oxb fswPpc21/+1by+NplSiTd9+PhiRijA9gA0dCmQ4wLJpLDQEwT9DzAXM3swVPfGBfU166o2 l3Tc6Z3ywQS/1sB6KZAg5nnQG64epAOgMcCtVa1oXuws8ZursRitNQRTsHZYmwNelrV9cs E1F4VLOdECgXhBvJIjn52oSE5pQ+vYL4I7hIqSNMbs4jx9NKHk0MCWS6jF3FWfz6a1u9rA XyPicpPOMmoGQALuzuo0NVocTuNXFjRd9Uf0k/OadtZyT7IVLcqdWb/5/o4hBA== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1631981238; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=RIkphok1mdVWZml7B3jdbHEN3/mdIlHgryPrWAYro/FpTVnmO6ja55vWRHexi8fVpSwo0W er1wlB4HL5s/5KCRtoIS2wWkqy3mZdz17bKYB51CbRP8eTpZ9DgajwMDaS3aezaYPBa8T2 /bEY4wgFRHD5VeXye2lrgnxbx0fNRxeujQCoNe53kyM+g8pUNFstqxYNgJvG/LRnD8IkOE 15ZHLmvim8pfbM36qN74FRvSSdr6ZrslGw9SqLikTzffkXJP9T6wgt5jtFIhyejKYxK2ol 8Mlm/3+DYFKHdxZNXodhoroKD91UL87HIp+BaOX8aqOrN5ztjjIeSEvI19EJdw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -1.39 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: BB1D198E6 X-Spam-Score: -1.39 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-TUID: TCYodFnn2HkU Hello! zimoun skribis: > Why the store item of source tarball is it different when applying the > transformation? > > Maxime provided a clue [1]. Maxime is right: =E2=80=98--with-source=E2=80=99 passes #:recursive? #t unc= onditionally, whereas it=E2=80=99s usually #f for a =E2=80=98url-fetch=E2=80=99 kind of U= RI. What we could do is make it #t if and only if the URL denotes a local file and that file is a directory. I think that would achieve what you want without any observable regression in practice. WDYT? Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99.