Bruno Victal <mirai@makinata.eu> writes:

>
> IMO if that's not the case, neither iwd nor wpa-supplicant backends should be pulled by connman. (or at least they should be required only if they are present among the services field)
> This is because not every machine comes or wants to use a wireless adapter.
>

Right, are you suggesting removing wpa-supplicant from requirement
field?

Yeah, it would make more sense and fit my needs too.