* bug#68229: go.powerpc64le-linux 1.14.15 fails test suite
[not found] <3393@guix-ci.nnrss>
@ 2024-01-03 16:29 ` Maxim Cournoyer
2024-01-03 16:53 ` Efraim Flashner
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Maxim Cournoyer @ 2024-01-03 16:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 68229; +Cc: Efraim Flashner
Hello,
cuirass@gnu.org (Cuirass) writes:
> <p>The build <b>go.powerpc64le-linux</b> for specification <b>master</b> is broken. You can find the detailed information about this build <a
> href="https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/3139760/details">here</a>.</p>
>
> https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/3139760/details
The test failure is:
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
--- FAIL: TestScript (0.00s)
--- FAIL: TestScript/vendor_complex (2.07s)
script_test.go:193:
# smoke test for complex build configuration (1.990s)
> go build -o complex.exe complex
> [exec:gccgo] go build -compiler=gccgo -o complex.exe complex
[stderr]
# complex
gccgo: error: unrecognized command-line option '-rpath=/gnu/store/qj6cnccz6vsffqa32rviw4zaqgh7xd6q-gcc-11.3.0-lib/lib'
[exit status 2]
FAIL: testdata/script/vendor_complex.txt:5: unexpected command failure
FAIL
FAIL cmd/go 46.068s
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
I don't see an obvious relationship with the recent commit touching
gccgo-12, but I'm CC'ing its author in case it could be.
--
Thanks,
Maxim
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* bug#68229: go.powerpc64le-linux 1.14.15 fails test suite
2024-01-03 16:29 ` bug#68229: go.powerpc64le-linux 1.14.15 fails test suite Maxim Cournoyer
@ 2024-01-03 16:53 ` Efraim Flashner
2024-01-03 17:59 ` Maxim Cournoyer
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Efraim Flashner @ 2024-01-03 16:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Maxim Cournoyer; +Cc: 68229-done
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1633 bytes --]
On Wed, Jan 03, 2024 at 11:29:50AM -0500, Maxim Cournoyer wrote:
> Hello,
>
> cuirass@gnu.org (Cuirass) writes:
>
> > <p>The build <b>go.powerpc64le-linux</b> for specification <b>master</b> is broken. You can find the detailed information about this build <a
> > href="https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/3139760/details">here</a>.</p>
> >
> > https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/3139760/details
>
> The test failure is:
>
> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
> --- FAIL: TestScript (0.00s)
> --- FAIL: TestScript/vendor_complex (2.07s)
> script_test.go:193:
> # smoke test for complex build configuration (1.990s)
> > go build -o complex.exe complex
> > [exec:gccgo] go build -compiler=gccgo -o complex.exe complex
> [stderr]
> # complex
> gccgo: error: unrecognized command-line option '-rpath=/gnu/store/qj6cnccz6vsffqa32rviw4zaqgh7xd6q-gcc-11.3.0-lib/lib'
> [exit status 2]
> FAIL: testdata/script/vendor_complex.txt:5: unexpected command failure
>
> FAIL
> FAIL cmd/go 46.068s
> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
>
> I don't see an obvious relationship with the recent commit touching
> gccgo-12, but I'm CC'ing its author in case it could be.
This one is go-1.14. That one already failed for ppc64le.
--
Efraim Flashner <efraim@flashner.co.il> רנשלפ םירפא
GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351
Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* bug#68229: go.powerpc64le-linux 1.14.15 fails test suite
2024-01-03 16:53 ` Efraim Flashner
@ 2024-01-03 17:59 ` Maxim Cournoyer
[not found] ` <EC18D8A8-75C1-49D1-833B-B62F8D955E29@flashner.co.il>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Maxim Cournoyer @ 2024-01-03 17:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Efraim Flashner; +Cc: 68229
Hello,
Efraim Flashner <efraim@flashner.co.il> writes:
> On Wed, Jan 03, 2024 at 11:29:50AM -0500, Maxim Cournoyer wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> cuirass@gnu.org (Cuirass) writes:
>>
>> > <p>The build <b>go.powerpc64le-linux</b> for specification
>> > <b>master</b> is broken. You can find the detailed information
>> > about this build <a
>> > href="https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/3139760/details">here</a>.</p>
>> >
>> > https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/3139760/details
>>
>> The test failure is:
>>
>> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
>> --- FAIL: TestScript (0.00s)
>> --- FAIL: TestScript/vendor_complex (2.07s)
>> script_test.go:193:
>> # smoke test for complex build configuration (1.990s)
>> > go build -o complex.exe complex
>> > [exec:gccgo] go build -compiler=gccgo -o complex.exe complex
>> [stderr]
>> # complex
>> gccgo: error: unrecognized command-line option
>> '-rpath=/gnu/store/qj6cnccz6vsffqa32rviw4zaqgh7xd6q-gcc-11.3.0-lib/lib'
>> [exit status 2]
>> FAIL: testdata/script/vendor_complex.txt:5: unexpected command failure
>>
>> FAIL
>> FAIL cmd/go 46.068s
>> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
>>
>> I don't see an obvious relationship with the recent commit touching
>> gccgo-12, but I'm CC'ing its author in case it could be.
>
> This one is go-1.14. That one already failed for ppc64le.
OK; Cuirass got it wrong again. Should we leave the ticket open though,
since it's an actual problem?
--
Thanks,
Maxim
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* bug#68229: go.powerpc64le-linux 1.14.15 fails test suite
[not found] ` <EC18D8A8-75C1-49D1-833B-B62F8D955E29@flashner.co.il>
@ 2024-01-10 4:31 ` Maxim Cournoyer
2024-01-10 5:30 ` Efraim Flashner
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Maxim Cournoyer @ 2024-01-10 4:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Efraim Flashner; +Cc: 68229
reopen 68229
quit
Hi,
Efraim Flashner <efraim@flashner.co.il> writes:
> On January 3, 2024 5:59:22 PM UTC, Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com> wrote:
>>Hello,
>>
>>Efraim Flashner <efraim@flashner.co.il> writes:
>>
>>> On Wed, Jan 03, 2024 at 11:29:50AM -0500, Maxim Cournoyer wrote:
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>> cuirass@gnu.org (Cuirass) writes:
>>>>
>>>> > <p>The build <b>go.powerpc64le-linux</b> for specification
>>>> > <b>master</b> is broken. You can find the detailed information
>>>> > about this build <a
>>>> > href="https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/3139760/details">here</a>.</p>
>>>> >
>>>> > https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/3139760/details
>>>>
>>>> The test failure is:
>>>>
>>>> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
>>>> --- FAIL: TestScript (0.00s)
>>>> --- FAIL: TestScript/vendor_complex (2.07s)
>>>> script_test.go:193:
>>>> # smoke test for complex build configuration (1.990s)
>>>> > go build -o complex.exe complex
>>>> > [exec:gccgo] go build -compiler=gccgo -o complex.exe complex
>>>> [stderr]
>>>> # complex
>>>> gccgo: error: unrecognized command-line option
>>>> '-rpath=/gnu/store/qj6cnccz6vsffqa32rviw4zaqgh7xd6q-gcc-11.3.0-lib/lib'
>>>> [exit status 2]
>>>> FAIL: testdata/script/vendor_complex.txt:5: unexpected command failure
>>>>
>>>> FAIL
>>>> FAIL cmd/go 46.068s
>>>> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
>>>>
>>>> I don't see an obvious relationship with the recent commit touching
>>>> gccgo-12, but I'm CC'ing its author in case it could be.
>>>
>>> This one is go-1.14. That one already failed for ppc64le.
>>
>>OK; Cuirass got it wrong again. Should we leave the ticket open though,
>>since it's an actual problem?
>>
> Fine with me. We should probably remove go-1.14 anyway if nothing
> depends on it. And either make it build on ppc64le or mark it not
> supported otherwise.
Alright, I'll leave this open for someone to pick up. The task would be
to remove go-1.14, incorporating it into go-1.16, which currently
inherits from it. Any takers?
--
Thanks,
Maxim
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* bug#68229: go.powerpc64le-linux 1.14.15 fails test suite
2024-01-10 4:31 ` Maxim Cournoyer
@ 2024-01-10 5:30 ` Efraim Flashner
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Efraim Flashner @ 2024-01-10 5:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Maxim Cournoyer; +Cc: 68229
On January 10, 2024 4:31:07 AM UTC, Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com> wrote:
>reopen 68229
>quit
>
>Hi,
>
>Efraim Flashner <efraim@flashner.co.il> writes:
>
>> On January 3, 2024 5:59:22 PM UTC, Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>Hello,
>>>
>>>Efraim Flashner <efraim@flashner.co.il> writes:
>>>
>>>> On Wed, Jan 03, 2024 at 11:29:50AM -0500, Maxim Cournoyer wrote:
>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>
>>>>> cuirass@gnu.org (Cuirass) writes:
>>>>>
>>>>> > <p>The build <b>go.powerpc64le-linux</b> for specification
>>>>> > <b>master</b> is broken. You can find the detailed information
>>>>> > about this build <a
>>>>> > href="https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/3139760/details">here</a>.</p>
>>>>> >
>>>>> > https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/3139760/details
>>>>>
>>>>> The test failure is:
>>>>>
>>>>> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
>>>>> --- FAIL: TestScript (0.00s)
>>>>> --- FAIL: TestScript/vendor_complex (2.07s)
>>>>> script_test.go:193:
>>>>> # smoke test for complex build configuration (1.990s)
>>>>> > go build -o complex.exe complex
>>>>> > [exec:gccgo] go build -compiler=gccgo -o complex.exe complex
>>>>> [stderr]
>>>>> # complex
>>>>> gccgo: error: unrecognized command-line option
>>>>> '-rpath=/gnu/store/qj6cnccz6vsffqa32rviw4zaqgh7xd6q-gcc-11.3.0-lib/lib'
>>>>> [exit status 2]
>>>>> FAIL: testdata/script/vendor_complex.txt:5: unexpected command failure
>>>>>
>>>>> FAIL
>>>>> FAIL cmd/go 46.068s
>>>>> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't see an obvious relationship with the recent commit touching
>>>>> gccgo-12, but I'm CC'ing its author in case it could be.
>>>>
>>>> This one is go-1.14. That one already failed for ppc64le.
>>>
>>>OK; Cuirass got it wrong again. Should we leave the ticket open though,
>>>since it's an actual problem?
>>>
>> Fine with me. We should probably remove go-1.14 anyway if nothing
>> depends on it. And either make it build on ppc64le or mark it not
>> supported otherwise.
>
>Alright, I'll leave this open for someone to pick up. The task would be
>to remove go-1.14, incorporating it into go-1.16, which currently
>inherits from it. Any takers?
>
https://issues.guix.gnu.org/68300
Although it currently rebuilds all go packages. I should probably fix that.
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-01-10 5:31 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <3393@guix-ci.nnrss>
2024-01-03 16:29 ` bug#68229: go.powerpc64le-linux 1.14.15 fails test suite Maxim Cournoyer
2024-01-03 16:53 ` Efraim Flashner
2024-01-03 17:59 ` Maxim Cournoyer
[not found] ` <EC18D8A8-75C1-49D1-833B-B62F8D955E29@flashner.co.il>
2024-01-10 4:31 ` Maxim Cournoyer
2024-01-10 5:30 ` Efraim Flashner
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.