From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org>
Received: from mp1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:4876::])
	(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	by ms13.migadu.com with LMTPS
	id 2PrDHVQpOmc+JQAA62LTzQ:P1
	(envelope-from <guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org>)
	for <larch@yhetil.org>; Sun, 17 Nov 2024 17:35:16 +0000
Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:4876::])
	(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	by mp1.migadu.com with LMTPS
	id 2PrDHVQpOmc+JQAA62LTzQ
	(envelope-from <guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org>)
	for <larch@yhetil.org>; Sun, 17 Nov 2024 18:35:16 +0100
X-Envelope-To: larch@yhetil.org
Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com;
	dkim=pass header.d=debbugs.gnu.org header.s=debbugs-gnu-org header.b=cwpeAZHo;
	dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=gnu.org header.s=fencepost-gnu-org header.b=nQb19nbE;
	dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org;
	spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"
ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1731864915; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none;
	b=r4Ea8SZbQ+LF5W1LOLDTT5O0ifSn9CdlqTcjTHeRs7oMXXo72OmV5UAjIUrjbIvoY6GvP2
	h7AJ+t5mnWlICzudBT5FpyvhxA2YTC/AtaSTa2Q2iX9kW/KxUKDHddSVZ8qcq7IXu0CTGm
	Ye/TKnxg1prC05eYJwGRv52wxF1U3McEF2pd3K4HwD0/u/Jo2QYekvIgGGbKCSwWj6q81W
	KzCMkUTKcETiVsCfSg2CY0aCiq07n/EFVkruVI94dm4E6qIs67TYaeJeSYGdRDFhIRnlAB
	DsaiZrwi4YRhsouGamSsSXza5AA78EA0swYd3XGY/lCUuSD7L/jBluuEnDigLA==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1;
	aspmx1.migadu.com;
	dkim=pass header.d=debbugs.gnu.org header.s=debbugs-gnu-org header.b=cwpeAZHo;
	dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=gnu.org header.s=fencepost-gnu-org header.b=nQb19nbE;
	dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org;
	spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org;
	s=key1; t=1731864915;
	h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:
	 message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:
	 content-type:content-type:
	 content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:resent-cc:
	 resent-from:resent-sender:resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:
	 references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe:
	 list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature;
	bh=eyinAZcoOOhiL04Kl4Ot3U5smPtkDeeWWkmyVZV8C3Y=;
	b=uQ3LZMR78DErE0H9X2V1TRV0UPHSCh55F1A/M5VFIq+HTeG+sTFcZ3eOs7JQ0/KUgkFT3Q
	kjxevGyEsWXlB7DVZvbAbXtRcodAf2V1oaXQHjJflrg72uH4TRzBLgJwRcmkyAoHUMswoP
	6DLa8EFsMRIN2oRvO+dvamrqq5D009QzrdeIgDKjRTwNVE3fjgurWAM9vyOSYiKGVapd6e
	wz+LDM51gKYgzRSX6Tj5o7rg5u9rrAb4CicfPTrPx30J0JDczhqkZmANJvubRQO84pRaAJ
	GFj3LKUDyze9L4SdR6xKK9LQMULDujXWkjmwWGZxroaEffix7oUstPVN1UaiyQ==
Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 480EB7A14B
	for <larch@yhetil.org>; Sun, 17 Nov 2024 18:35:15 +0100 (CET)
Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
	(envelope-from <guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org>)
	id 1tCjAt-0007DS-I9; Sun, 17 Nov 2024 12:35:03 -0500
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10])
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
 id 1tCjAs-0007DK-Gs
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Nov 2024 12:35:02 -0500
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43])
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
 id 1tCjAs-0007S9-7u
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Nov 2024 12:35:02 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=debbugs.gnu.org; s=debbugs-gnu-org; 
 h=MIME-Version:Date:References:In-Reply-To:From:To:Subject;
 bh=eyinAZcoOOhiL04Kl4Ot3U5smPtkDeeWWkmyVZV8C3Y=; 
 b=cwpeAZHosr8MJzOWUwzL93JtcEI+ahSpBAhyE49H650Nfj228fWAEQd239G/yBWKiRJUqGiCAEr7cnk0rQL3YvK6EOeSqaCL1op73c5uk2ag5NOgGk4jWdsPnbF3Hk3KblU5S9PQkKQ7jOTQ2xUVgfeW7x2T+EdlYrJLr3G4sr8hXugCtsmPvu2vuK2pk2GIAWo/nRzQSMuziUEEUq931nNSWwbtKlkmMGPIfGsoJxvBYBMn4OQWMgCKOvkjw2VyUwgE+V7wAXXitEdyyErnpvO+1Wah6E6woSyrQlPxanZvU6nYb6DltViP3UsbmAwIHuGSyNrF6J0la8GRIsNSCQ==;
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1tCjAs-0005Nn-1P
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Nov 2024 12:35:02 -0500
X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org
Subject: [bug#74290] [PATCH v2 14/40] DRAFT gnu: bootstrap: Add support for
 x86_64-gnu, aka the 64bit Hurd.
Resent-From: <janneke@gnu.org>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org
Resent-Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2024 17:35:01 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.74290.B74290.173186489720673@debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 74290
X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch
To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@gnu.org>
Cc: 74290@debbugs.gnu.org, Josselin Poiret <dev@jpoiret.xyz>,
 Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com>,
 Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune@gmail.com>, Mathieu Othacehe <othacehe@gnu.org>,
 Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me@tobias.gr>, Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr>,
 Christopher Baines <guix@cbaines.net>
Received: via spool by 74290-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B74290.173186489720673
 (code B ref 74290); Sun, 17 Nov 2024 17:35:01 +0000
Received: (at 74290) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Nov 2024 17:34:57 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58451 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org>)
 id 1tCjAm-0005NM-Sd
 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 17 Nov 2024 12:34:57 -0500
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:51458)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <janneke@gnu.org>) id 1tCjAj-0005N8-Vm
 for 74290@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 17 Nov 2024 12:34:55 -0500
Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e])
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <janneke@gnu.org>)
 id 1tCjAb-0007Nm-Q4; Sun, 17 Nov 2024 12:34:45 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org;
 s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:Date:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:To:
 From; bh=eyinAZcoOOhiL04Kl4Ot3U5smPtkDeeWWkmyVZV8C3Y=; b=nQb19nbEfAeKsts63fDW
 b4m1rdyoV2vgEqD7cx8hTU5EB46eP4PdTifMjtKXY+KrtDcB1Z5q9xupmhykIyWXKFwPTwLBv+e9K
 pdLznJxSdVQI1uGJWF5Epc5W9OXa49wrzySkxpITyDgHtqgEjRT4GgkEidS3Mc4SJ8tTL1fPBJoJW
 WgRRv0jSsbb48WYi93g9vmvZskUyhZ0W+pvrPlUTF/uNv4CwF/SrHOtx3pb5S8EYDaTy8yIdYQjof
 d4n0KBKky+VfQCwvawHxLnLBwOsLbDUtDirxwIg7wJPXI02LS8rkttHIQce1iZi8+lHfXwntDXMxP
 puFL3CCY+Z5lsA==;
From: <janneke@gnu.org>
In-Reply-To: <874j45ls8s.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?="'s
 message of "Sun, 17 Nov 2024 17:50:11 +0100")
Organization: AvatarAcademy.nl
References: <cover.1731427612.git.janneke@gnu.org>
 <c5bb9d59fbc4da6afce444a8da0b057bd8607a39.1731427612.git.janneke@gnu.org>
 <874j45ls8s.fsf@gnu.org>
X-Url: http://AvatarAcademy.nl
Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2024 18:34:41 +0100
Message-ID: <87frnpn4r2.fsf@gnu.org>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org
List-Id: <guix-patches.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-patches>,
 <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-patches>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-patches@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-patches>,
 <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org
Sender: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org
X-Migadu-Country: US
X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN
X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -2.03
X-Spam-Score: -2.03
X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 480EB7A14B
X-Migadu-Scanner: mx10.migadu.com
X-TUID: 2nRpKeARWr7r

Ludovic Court=C3=A8s writes:

> Janneke Nieuwenhuizen <janneke@gnu.org> skribis:
>
>> +++ b/gnu/packages/bootstrap.scm
>> @@ -125,6 +125,15 @@ (define %bootstrap-executables
>>        ,(base32 "0nq2c1zb3wv5bf7kd83sziaashydazrn7xgq6kijlk0zj2syzc2m"))
>>       ("xz"
>>        ,(base32 "033rhpk6zrpxpd6ffjyg5y2zwq9x9cnq0zljb7k8jlncbalsayq5")))
>> +    ("x86_64-gnu"
>> +     ("bash"
>> +      ,(base32 "1ib1kk1larki3dm46lhl756856zpjwhhlnzkgdyh9f1yf6wm431y"))
>> +     ("mkdir"
>> +      ,(base32 "15cnckq4qj1nlmgqy9vq3qa3kcbfm1pc2z38pscxix11j4aqswsm"))
>> +     ("tar"
>> +      ,(base32 "1m8v7ddmn42wym2kl9mf7csnwsw6c3jdglg7d7kp7yaa16h5fbck"))
>> +     ("xz"
>> +      ,(base32 "16cnr7vr0zawrwcnhshms3v5kyzb2vz1rp4kxmx507cs6rivd05b")))
>
> Are the i586-gnu binaries usable on x86_64-gnu?

No, at least not currently.  The mach message format even differs, AFAIK.

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
root@guixygnu64 ~# file bash-i586
bash-i586: ELF 32-bit LSB executable, Intel 80386, version 1 (SYSV), static=
ally linked, for GNU/Hurd 0.0.0, stripped

root@guixygnu64 ~# ./bash-i586 --help
-bash: ./bash-i586: cannot execute binary file: Exec format error
[..]
root@debian:~# ./bash-i586 --help
-bash: ./bash-i586: cannot execute binary file: Exec format error
[..]
root@childhurd ~# ./bash-i586=20
I have no name!@childhurd ~# ./bash-i586 --help
GNU bash, version 5.0.16(1)-release-(i586-pc-gnu)
Usage: ./bash-i586 [GNU long option] [option] ...
      ./bash-i586 [GNU long option] [option] script-file ...
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

> That would be sweet, and it would allow us have a single set of binary
> seeds instead of two.

Yeah...but no, and we'd need a gcc-14 anyway.

Greetings,
Janneke

--=20
Janneke Nieuwenhuizen <janneke@gnu.org>  | GNU LilyPond https://LilyPond.org
Freelance IT https://www.JoyOfSource.com | Avatar=C2=AE https://AvatarAcade=
my.com