From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add ttf-symbola.
Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2014 22:09:33 +0100
Message-ID: <87egt2df8y.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <87iojcdp53.fsf@gmail.com> <20141023062654.GB6636@debian>
	<8761farhzp.fsf@gmail.com> <20141023173605.466.47994@rook>
	<87wq7qatee.fsf@gmail.com>
	<20141024065236.7150.29212@vulcan.local.tld> <87vbmi6emu.fsf@gnu.org>
	<20141116192756.22656.57197@vulcan.local.tld>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35549)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1Xq74m-0000rf-0e
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Nov 2014 16:09:44 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1Xq74h-0004tB-5r
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Nov 2014 16:09:39 -0500
Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([2a01:474::1]:58108)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>)
	id 1Xq74g-0004t5-Uw
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Nov 2014 16:09:35 -0500
In-Reply-To: <20141116192756.22656.57197@vulcan.local.tld> (Ian Denhardt's
	message of "Sun, 16 Nov 2014 14:27:57 -0500")
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Ian Denhardt <ian@zenhack.net>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org, Alex Kost <alezost@gmail.com>

Ian Denhardt <ian@zenhack.net> skribis:

> Quoting Ludovic Court=C3=A8s (2014-11-13 15:15:37)
>> Did you hear from them?
>
> Finally, yes. Here's the full response:

Great, thanks.

> Quoting Donald R Robertson III (2014-11-11 10:57:53)

[...]

>> The best course of action would be to contact the author to try and
>> clear up these issues. As you can see from our license list
>> <https://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html#Fonts>, however, there
>> isn't a font license that we could really recommend that would cover the
>> same ground as what the author has outlined. But we could work with him
>> to try and get a better licensing situation. If you think it is worth
>> pursuing, please let us know and we will contact them

It=E2=80=99s probably worth pursuing, although I can imagine they=E2=80=99d=
 rather spend
a reasonable effort on it.

Ludo=E2=80=99.