From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: taylanbayirli@gmail.com (Taylan Ulrich =?utf-8?Q?Bay=C4=B1rl=C4=B1?= =?utf-8?Q?=2FKammer?=) Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: ecl: Update to version 15.2.21. Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2015 02:17:53 +0100 Message-ID: <87egpikam6.fsf@taylan.uni.cx> References: <87y4nrkki5.fsf@taylan.uni.cx> <878ufqbx9m.fsf@netris.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52650) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YPLBF-0001B4-12 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Feb 2015 20:17:57 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YPLBD-0001ms-Si for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Feb 2015 20:17:56 -0500 Received: from mail-wi0-x236.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c05::236]:42150) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YPLBD-0001mh-MB for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Feb 2015 20:17:55 -0500 Received: by mail-wi0-f182.google.com with SMTP id l15so9940173wiw.3 for ; Sat, 21 Feb 2015 17:17:55 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <878ufqbx9m.fsf@netris.org> (Mark H. Weaver's message of "Sat, 21 Feb 2015 19:33:25 -0500") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Mark H Weaver Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Mark H Weaver writes: > Did they fix parallel builds upstream? Apparently (or supposedly, see below) it was fixed upstream some time, and there was just no release in a long time: http://sourceforge.net/p/ecls/bugs/98/ User "jackdaniel" is apparently the new maintainer, and the project will be moving to Gitorious soon: http://sourceforge.net/p/ecls/news/2015/02/ecl-15221-released-new-maintainer-found/ That being said, your following inquiry tempted me to run the build process again to get the exact output, and I faced what I describe in the second additional message in this bug report: http://sourceforge.net/p/ecls/bugs/300/ > Could we disable only the specific tests that need /etc/protocols? > How many failures are there? Sadly, as now mentioned in the above bug report, the whole system fails to start with a "protocol not supported" error. I guess the best way to go is to keep the test suite disabled for now, but add additional comments pointing to the above bug report as well as so someone updating the package will know what changes to look forward to. WDYT? Taylan