From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: Re: Website, differentiating GuixSD vs Guix Date: Mon, 25 May 2015 16:18:32 +0200 Message-ID: <87egm43flz.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87d21vrr3q.fsf@denknerd.org> <32bcd1c56a0d936948bd80957c9020e8@openmailbox.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53009) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YwtDD-0003j6-V3 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 25 May 2015 10:18:40 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YwtDA-0004az-LI for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 25 May 2015 10:18:39 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:43968) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YwtDA-0004av-I4 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 25 May 2015 10:18:36 -0400 In-Reply-To: <32bcd1c56a0d936948bd80957c9020e8@openmailbox.org> ("Luis Felipe =?utf-8?Q?L=C3=B3pez?= Acevedo"'s message of "Sun, 24 May 2015 12:31:57 -0500") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Luis Felipe =?utf-8?Q?L=C3=B3pez?= Acevedo Cc: Guix-devel Luis Felipe L=C3=B3pez Acevedo skribis: > On 2015-05-24 11:44, Amirouche Boubekki wrote: [...] >> What do you think about using a =E2=80=9Claptop logo=E2=80=9D or somethi= ng for GSD >> instead of the =E2=80=9Cpackage=E2=80=9D? > > I think it's a good idea. I can make the change if others agree. Why not, sounds good to me. Ludo=E2=80=99.