[PATCH] gnu: xz: Update to 5.2.1

[PATCH] gnu: xz: Update to 5.2.1

[宋文武]

[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: 0001-gnu-xz-Update-to-5.2.1.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 1140 bytes --]

From 28016e1de7b60c8d23728b66c2dc90d6cd1e4c3c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?=E5=AE=8B=E6=96=87=E6=AD=A6?= <iyzsong@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2015 14:25:11 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] gnu: xz: Update to 5.2.1.

* gnu/packages/compression.scm (xz): Update to 5.2.1.
---
 gnu/packages/compression.scm | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gnu/packages/compression.scm b/gnu/packages/compression.scm
index 287ae25..354f51b 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/compression.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/compression.scm
@@ -225,14 +225,14 @@ decompression.")
 (define-public xz
   (package
    (name "xz")
-   (version "5.0.4")
+   (version "5.2.1")
    (source (origin
             (method url-fetch)
             (uri (string-append "http://tukaani.org/xz/xz-" version
                                 ".tar.gz"))
             (sha256
              (base32
-              "1dl35ca8fdss9z2d6y234gxh24ixq904xksizrjmjr5dimwhax6n"))))
+              "10a6jxxpm6gbypx5jwhqkq201y1xcvpbb7g1ga6lzrvnh1jbc65r"))))
    (build-system gnu-build-system)
    (synopsis "General-purpose data compression")
    (description
-- 
2.4.3


[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 121 bytes --]


This seem trigger the rebuild of everything, should I push it into
the current 'core-updates' or wait for a next cycle?

Re: [PATCH] gnu: xz: Update to 5.2.1

[Mathieu Lirzin]

宋文武 <iyzsong@gmail.com> writes:

> This seem trigger the rebuild of everything, should I push it into
> the current 'core-updates' or wait for a next cycle?

This doesn't respond to your question, but could I suggest the
reformatting of the 'origin' S-expression?  Like recently described
here... :)

<https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2015-09/msg00284.html> 

Thanks,

--
Mathieu Lirzin

Re: [PATCH] gnu: xz: Update to 5.2.1

[宋文武]

Mathieu Lirzin <mthl@openmailbox.org> writes:

> 宋文武 <iyzsong@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> This seem trigger the rebuild of everything, should I push it into
>> the current 'core-updates' or wait for a next cycle?
>
> This doesn't respond to your question, but could I suggest the
> reformatting of the 'origin' S-expression?  Like recently described
> here... :)
>
> <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2015-09/msg00284.html> 
>
Sure, I have read the thread, but don't get what the desired format for
'origin' is.

Usually, I edit files in Emacs, and use:
  (package
    (name "..")
    (source (origin
              (method url-fetch)
              (...)))
    ...)

So, what it should be now?

Thanks!

Re: [PATCH] gnu: xz: Update to 5.2.1

[Mathieu Lirzin]

宋文武 <iyzsong@gmail.com> writes:

> Mathieu Lirzin <mthl@openmailbox.org> writes:
>> [...]
>> <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2015-09/msg00284.html> 
>>
> Sure, I have read the thread, but don't get what the desired format for
> 'origin' is.
>
> Usually, I edit files in Emacs, and use:
>   (package
>     (name "..")
>     (source (origin
>               (method url-fetch)
>               (...)))
>     ...)
>
> So, what it should be now?

It's still the same. The only new thing (at least for me) is that this
is now explicitly the recommended format.

Being the recommended format means that this is OK to silently reformat
code that don't use it.

--
Mathieu Lirzin