From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
Subject: Re: Add murmur.
Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2017 23:50:02 +0100
Message-ID: <87efz7asit.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <20170201204312.3005-1-contact.ng0@cryptolab.net>
	<87mvdvxq9v.fsf@gnu.org> <20170209182030.ngn2dsdfbzsmymdj@wasp>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50716)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1cbxXW-00089a-Ac
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Feb 2017 17:50:11 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1cbxXS-000403-EX
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Feb 2017 17:50:10 -0500
Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:52482)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>)
	id 1cbxXS-0003zw-CK
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Feb 2017 17:50:06 -0500
Received: from reverse-83.fdn.fr ([80.67.176.83]:59050 helo=ribbon)
	by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256)
	(Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1cbxXR-00031E-Pi
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Feb 2017 17:50:06 -0500
In-Reply-To: <20170209182030.ngn2dsdfbzsmymdj@wasp> (ng0's message of "Thu, 9
	Feb 2017 18:20:30 +0000")
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: guix-devel@gnu.org

ng0 <contact.ng0@cryptolab.net> skribis:

> On 17-02-09 17:50:04, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote:
>> Hi ng0!
>>=20
>> contact.ng0@cryptolab.net skribis:
>>=20
>> > This patch adds an proposed change to mumble, murmur as an output.
>>=20
>> I=E2=80=99m reluctant to =E2=80=9Cnon-standard=E2=80=9D outputs like thi=
s.  The reason for
>> multiple outputs should be to reduce the closure size for standards
>> uses.  What do we gain by not included murmurd in =E2=80=9Cout=E2=80=9D =
in this case?
>>=20
>> Thanks,
>> Ludo=E2=80=99.
>
> We remove the server component (murmurd) from the client component
> (mumble).  I imagine that if you run murmurd, you will not want mumble
> in the same user profile.  And if you run mumble, you probably don't
> want murmurd.  The default is a client, adding murmur output is logical.
> But this is just my view.. I would not want a server unless I explicitly
> expressed my intention to have it
>
> What do you think?

I think the only reason to separate things usually is size, not
=E2=80=9Caesthetics.=E2=80=9D  So I=E2=80=99d be in favor of keeping both i=
n the same output if
there=E2=80=99s no size problem.

How does that sound?

Ludo=E2=80=99.