From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marius Bakke Subject: Re: =?utf-8?Q?Let=E2=80=99s?= freeze and build =?utf-8?Q?=E2=80=98core-updates=E2=80=99!?= Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2017 19:49:42 +0100 Message-ID: <87efya44vt.fsf@kirby.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> References: <87mvdpw3b3.fsf@gnu.org> <87zihoizr4.fsf@kirby.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <87tw7wspwp.fsf@gnu.org> <87zihfwshj.fsf@kirby.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <20170221173201.GA9718@jasmine> <20170221174149.GA5944@jasmine> <87innmzrrt.fsf@gnu.org> <20170306184246.GD2185@jasmine> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41430) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ckxhc-0002nU-R4 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Mar 2017 13:49:49 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ckxhZ-0000aI-Ok for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Mar 2017 13:49:48 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20170306184246.GD2185@jasmine> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Leo Famulari , Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Leo Famulari writes: > On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 10:19:34AM +0100, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: >> Hello Guix! >>=20 >> Looks like there=E2=80=99s been a disk space issue a few days ago that= =E2=80=99s now >> solved, so I=E2=80=99ve restarted an evaluation of the =E2=80=9Ccore=E2= =80=9D subset. >>=20 >> Is there any blocker left or should we move forward after that? > > Let's also decide what to do about GRUB. I updated it originally because > something (I forgot what) failed to build without a newer GRUB. I think you meant "flex" here. According to https://github.com/westes/flex/issues/162 , this commit should fix the grub issue: https://github.com/westes/flex/commit/f5d87f1a26f4a5c3402497008ae10e9a1345d= 327 Seeing as wireshark is apparently also affected according to the upstream bug, I would suggest applying this fix on our flex package. Alternatively package a "flex-for-grub" variant, but that's not very re-usable. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEEu7At3yzq9qgNHeZDoqBt8qM6VPoFAli9r0YACgkQoqBt8qM6 VPoHPggAooDhhB241IVzl5mX4k2/kpDxI89Du5X/JSMr46NdSMu2/Gy3r1nFHb1O NRdxKmT77A3dgoq6NiuMEcJjre9Q2/aQoIc+mPh0Yb4YiXOofJfg1RlAtBzYkEt4 RfWbPoaoHFb8ZUYM9JETiFRfIIQN+pVP5lvO9gNmHoVs1s6XkGq44Kw5Ch+2YTOx 8NqTD91Vt5ESUO36kkRfOd51YWav5edrWmlSb/E6ofufO+du9Z8dHS75WnhF784D n/B6RDQZ8HMvFj4QUwX0iCEl8iN3e+cIRKsFgpXfOjkCTy9QWc+e+iYMMEzrOcoE bZouttrkrJCCxuhMl91sSduQIVMeUg== =DcOS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--