From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Katherine Cox-Buday Subject: Re: potluck status Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2017 08:46:25 -0500 Message-ID: <87efwcir0u.fsf@gmail.com> References: <5903389D.3080101@crazy-compilers.com> <87d1bwu1rr.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33613) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d46ED-0005gf-9u for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Apr 2017 09:46:34 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d46E8-000662-Cp for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Apr 2017 09:46:33 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Incoherent-lime's message of "Fri, 28 Apr 2017 09:12:07 -0400") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Incoherent-lime Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org I don't hold any strong opinions on the name, but in the interest of ideas: - guix quorum - guix collab - guix confer - guix conjoin That's all I have for now :) -- Katherine