From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
Subject: Re: Heads-up: transition to Guile 2.2
Date: Thu, 11 May 2017 22:53:04 +0200
Message-ID: <87efvvnmj3.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <87bmt28qnm.fsf@gnu.org> <87k26chy16.fsf@gnu.org>
	<87y3u5wwsi.fsf_-_@gnu.org> <864lwtzmxj.fsf@gmail.com>
	<87inl8vrw4.fsf@gnu.org> <8660h8k56i.fsf@gmail.com>
	<86efvwxm3i.fsf@gmail.com> <87k25nx0cp.fsf@gnu.org>
	<CAEwRq=q4fXUuARm4RJHO=pgDsUyc5P4tZrN_S+ti6=5yEgyLfA@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34042)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1d8v5J-0006sN-91
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 11 May 2017 16:53:18 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1d8v5E-0007jo-If
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 11 May 2017 16:53:15 -0400
In-Reply-To: <CAEwRq=q4fXUuARm4RJHO=pgDsUyc5P4tZrN_S+ti6=5yEgyLfA@mail.gmail.com>
	(Vincent Legoll's message of "Thu, 11 May 2017 10:50:13 +0200")
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Vincent Legoll <vincent.legoll@gmail.com>
Cc: guix-devel <guix-devel@gnu.org>, myglc2 <myglc2@gmail.com>

Vincent Legoll <vincent.legoll@gmail.com> skribis:

>> This is a special setup.  The warning above just stats
>> ~/.config/guix/latest.  For someone using =E2=80=98guix pull=E2=80=99, i=
t=E2=80=99s a symlink
>> that=E2=80=99s updated each time =E2=80=98guix pull=E2=80=99 is invoked.
>
> Would there be a downside to stating the pointed-to file rather than
> the link itself ?

I can already tell you that the mtime of the symlink target is 1.
:-)

Ludo=E2=80=99.