From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42871) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dALe6-0007Gq-Vw for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 15 May 2017 15:27:08 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dALe2-0008FF-3K for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 15 May 2017 15:27:06 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:44244) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dALe1-0008Et-V7 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 15 May 2017 15:27:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dALe1-0006Ow-Ms for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 15 May 2017 15:27:01 -0400 Subject: bug#26940: [PATCH 1/3] gnu: Add http-parser. Resent-Message-ID: References: <87fug6w7ba.fsf@elephly.net> <20170515140122.26545-1-rekado@elephly.net> <87inl2dnlg.fsf@fastmail.com> From: Ricardo Wurmus In-reply-to: <87inl2dnlg.fsf@fastmail.com> Date: Mon, 15 May 2017 21:26:09 +0200 Message-ID: <87efvp7wha.fsf@elephly.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Marius Bakke Cc: 26940@debbugs.gnu.org Marius Bakke writes: > Ricardo Wurmus writes: > >> * gnu/packages/web.scm (http-parser): New variable. > > [...] > >> + (description "This is a parser for HTTP messages written in C. It parses >> +both requests and responses. The parser is designed to be used in performance >> +HTTP applications. It does not make any syscalls nor allocations, it does not >> +buffer data, it can be interrupted at anytime. Depending on your architecture, >> +it only requires about 40 bytes of data per message stream (in a web server >> +that is per connection).") > > Some missing spaces in the description here. The sentences also read a > bit weird, should it be "high-performance HTTP applications"? Or > performant? Maybe just "fast"? LGTM with cosmetic fix. Thanks for the suggestions! -- Ricardo GPG: BCA6 89B6 3655 3801 C3C6 2150 197A 5888 235F ACAC https://elephly.net