From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ricardo Wurmus Subject: Re: a GUIX_PACKAGE_PATH / modules puzzle Date: Sun, 13 May 2018 07:15:24 +0200 Message-ID: <87efigcf0z.fsf@elephly.net> References: <20180501223951.whoj67yv2h3t6wyl@abyayala> <87bmdxwc6y.fsf@gmail.com> <20180503053613.dffmd6ag57x26fdt@abyayala> <87a7thxkw2.fsf@gmail.com> <20180503083033.457tdfmh5qmauqb4@abyayala> <20180510222726.46zv7dsm32ufgyhj@abyayala> <20180510232635.ncez2ai4736cysfd@abyayala> <20180511070050.oijp5l6mm5smtvuk@abyayala> <87k1s9c7lz.fsf@elephly.net> <20180512194536.qgnxh2jt255bssch@abyayala> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33480) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fHmst-0000Lm-2R for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 13 May 2018 05:01:39 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fHmsp-0002PG-VL for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 13 May 2018 05:01:39 -0400 Received: from sender-of-o51.zoho.com ([135.84.80.216]:21030) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fHmsp-0002Ot-NK for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 13 May 2018 05:01:35 -0400 In-reply-to: <20180512194536.qgnxh2jt255bssch@abyayala> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Nils Gillmann Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Nils Gillmann writes: >> If you have a file =E2=80=9Ccore/lang-perl/perl.scm=E2=80=9D and the mod= ule is called >> =E2=80=9C(core lang-perl perl)=E2=80=9D then you should not have =E2=80= =9Ccore=E2=80=9D itself on >> GUIX_PACKAGE_PATH but its parent directory. > > In my example (pkgs lang-perl perl) itself had the parent directory "pkgs= ". > I admit, code examples would've made it more clear.. > > Since we can point to github.com regularly, I think my private server wou= ld > not be considered problematic? It is better to provide a minimal example that demonstrates the problem. This is better than providing a full repository and ask other people to figure out what is relevant and what is not. --=20 Ricardo