From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:53303) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gtilS-0006Rm-RB for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Feb 2019 19:51:03 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gtilS-0003WR-4b for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Feb 2019 19:51:02 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:46329) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gtilS-0003W7-0t for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Feb 2019 19:51:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gtilR-0001aU-Q4 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Feb 2019 19:51:01 -0500 Subject: [bug#34382] [PATCH 4/5] gnu: Add python-docstyle. Resent-Message-ID: References: <875ztusyxz.fsf@posteo.net> <87sgwsfxhb.fsf@gnu.org> From: Brett Gilio In-reply-to: <87sgwsfxhb.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2019 18:50:22 -0600 Message-ID: <87ef8cfr5d.fsf@posteo.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: 34382-done@debbugs.gnu.org Ludovic Court=C3=A8s writes: > Brett Gilio skribis: > >>>>From 0b66f38dd41230611cad44181a81bda38e40619f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >> From: Brett Gilio >> Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2019 22:04:52 -0600 >> Subject: [PATCH 4/5] gnu: Add python-docstyle. >> >> * gnu/packages/python-xyz.scm (python-docstyle): New variable. > > Pushed as well. > > This series ended up taking me more time than I thought. :-) > First the patches were sent in reverse order, which I only realized > later. Then each patch had tiny issues (indentation, inappropriate > description, code duplication, etc.) that I ended up fixing because they > looked tiny at first=E2=80=A6 > > Please pay more attention to these things in the future. > > Regardless, thank you for the patches! > > Ludo=E2=80=99. Thank you Ludo, This was my first series, so I appreciate the comments you gave me for feedback and I will be more diligent in the future! Brett