From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:46264)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1iZNeE-0002XY-W6
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Nov 2019 18:20:03 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1iZNeE-0007mX-0W
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Nov 2019 18:20:02 -0500
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:43958)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
 (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
 id 1iZNeD-0007mQ-Sy
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Nov 2019 18:20:01 -0500
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1iZNeD-00070z-PQ
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Nov 2019 18:20:01 -0500
Subject: bug#38312: [PATCH 3/3] guix build: '--keep-failed' implies
 '--no-offload'.
Resent-To: guix-patches@gnu.org
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.38312.D38312.157472395726901.done@debbugs.gnu.org>
From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@gnu.org>
References: <20191121150358.21044-1-ludo@gnu.org>
 <20191121150358.21044-2-ludo@gnu.org>
 <86FB364B-E8B7-4813-A7C8-AAB4A74B3EB2@carldong.me>
 <877e3tozlz.fsf@gnu.org>
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2019 00:19:07 +0100
In-Reply-To: <877e3tozlz.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic
 \=\?utf-8\?Q\?Court\=C3\=A8s\=22'\?\=
 \=\?utf-8\?Q\?s\?\= message of "Thu, 21 Nov 2019 19:26:00 +0100")
Message-ID: <87eexvtuhg.fsf@gnu.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
List-Id: <guix-patches.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-patches>,
 <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-patches>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-patches@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-patches>,
 <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-patches" <guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org>
To: Carl Dong <contact@carldong.me>
Cc: 38312-done@debbugs.gnu.org

Hello,

I went ahead and pushed these patches:

  2ce08a5d79 guix build: '--keep-failed' implies '--no-offload'.
  7f44ab48f9 Use 'offload?' instead of 'build-hook?' internally.
  dc209d5a5d guix build, daemon: Rename "--no-build-hook" to "--no-offload".

Let me know if you can think of ways we can make the --no-offload effect
more visible.

Thanks,
Ludo=E2=80=99.