From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:32953) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1isMGZ-0003vo-9U for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Jan 2020 02:42:04 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1isMGY-0003aT-As for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Jan 2020 02:42:03 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:32816) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1isMGY-0003a0-2I for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Jan 2020 02:42:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1isMGX-00009I-SJ for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Jan 2020 02:42:01 -0500 Subject: [bug#39086] [PATCH 3/5] gnu: Add unicode-cldr-common. Resent-Message-ID: References: <20200111120829.29821-1-leo.prikler@student.tugraz.at> <20200111120829.29821-3-leo.prikler@student.tugraz.at> <87imlbxg7a.fsf@elephly.net> <51f014f61bee4c453c50d954b501a3b1dc17370e.camel@student.tugraz.at> From: Ricardo Wurmus In-reply-to: <51f014f61bee4c453c50d954b501a3b1dc17370e.camel@student.tugraz.at> Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2020 08:41:30 +0100 Message-ID: <87eevyy1g5.fsf@elephly.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Leo Prikler Cc: 39086@debbugs.gnu.org Leo Prikler writes: > Am Donnerstag, den 16.01.2020, 22:08 +0100 schrieb Ricardo Wurmus: >> Leo Prikler writes: >>=20 >> > * gnu/packages/ibus (unicode-cldr-commmon): New package. >>=20 >> This should be: >>=20 >> * gnu/packages/ibus.scm (unicode-cldr-commmon): New variable. >>=20 >> You know, I wonder if these things really belong to ibus.scm. I >> remember a TODO somewhere in the code that bemoaned the lack of >> versioned Unicode data files. Perhaps we should just add a new >> module >> (gnu packages unicode) =E2=80=94 what do you think? > I don't mind either way, but these packages don't fix the TODO. They > add yet unseen features. That=E2=80=99s okay. I just think we should start that new unicode.scm mod= ule to finally have a place for these data files. That would be a more appropriate place than ibus.scm. --=20 Ricardo