From: Vagrant Cascadian <vagrant@debian.org>
To: "Ludovic Courtès" <ludo@gnu.org>
Cc: 40650@debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#40650: ‘scandir*’ test failure
Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2020 13:19:30 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87eeskeect.fsf@ponder> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87ftd0604z.fsf_-_@gnu.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1140 bytes --]
On 2020-04-18, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Vagrant Cascadian <vagrant@debian.org> skribis:
>
>> test-name: scandir*, properties
>> location: /build/guix-YPdZIs/guix-1.1.0/tests/syscalls.scm:257
>> source:
...
> Looking at this test, the only way ‘every’ could return #f is (1) if
> ‘lstat’ returns a different inode number, or (2) if ‘lstat’ returns a
> different file type than the one for ‘scandir*’.
My debian package builds are done using a overlay fs(with tmpfs on top,
and ext4 below), which might explain inode discrepancies... this sort of
thing is not uncommon in Debian package building environments.
If that's indeed triggering the issue, maybe it needs some sort of
workaround or a way to detect if it should skip the test?
> Unfortunately it’s hard to tell more without debugging interactively on
> the machine, adding ‘pk’ calls here and there to see.
>
> Can you reproduce this test failure in a simpler environment when
> interactive debugging is possible?
Yeah, I could build in a one-off chroot or virtual machine using a
"normal" filesystem.
live well,
vagrant
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 227 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-04-18 20:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-04-15 22:03 bug#40650: guix test suite failures building Debian package Vagrant Cascadian
2020-04-16 8:40 ` Ludovic Courtès
2020-04-16 17:23 ` Vagrant Cascadian
2020-04-17 8:50 ` Ludovic Courtès
2020-04-17 22:13 ` Vagrant Cascadian
2020-04-18 19:53 ` bug#40650: ‘scandir*’ test failure Ludovic Courtès
2020-04-18 20:19 ` Vagrant Cascadian [this message]
2020-04-19 11:01 ` Ludovic Courtès
2020-04-18 20:00 ` bug#40650: guix test suite failures building Debian package Ludovic Courtès
2020-04-18 20:02 ` Ludovic Courtès
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87eeskeect.fsf@ponder \
--to=vagrant@debian.org \
--cc=40650@debbugs.gnu.org \
--cc=ludo@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.