* Packaging ‘clang-tools-extra’ (‘clang-tidy’, etc.)
@ 2020-04-24 13:36 Ludovic Courtès
2020-04-24 17:07 ` Nikita Gillmann
2020-05-29 16:57 ` Ludovic Courtès
0 siblings, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Ludovic Courtès @ 2020-04-24 13:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: guix-devel
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1649 bytes --]
Hello!
The patch below produces a ‘clang’ package that contains
‘clang-tools-extra’ commands¹.
The problem is the size. Before:
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
$ guix size /gnu/store/qxdpxbvfdxfy5dnz4haql4xlxpmb5r6b-clang-10.0.0 |tail -1
total: 995.2 MiB
$ guix size /gnu/store/qxdpxbvfdxfy5dnz4haql4xlxpmb5r6b-clang-10.0.0 |head -2
store item total self
/gnu/store/qxdpxbvfdxfy5dnz4haql4xlxpmb5r6b-clang-10.0.0 995.2 456.5 45.9%
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
After:
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
$ guix size /gnu/store/5h3xgpg33wip2b8ccri690jp6ikbq16s-clang-10.0.0 |tail -1
total: 1525.4 MiB
$ guix size /gnu/store/5h3xgpg33wip2b8ccri690jp6ikbq16s-clang-10.0.0 |head -2
store item total self
/gnu/store/5h3xgpg33wip2b8ccri690jp6ikbq16s-clang-10.0.0 1525.4 986.8 64.7%
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
(How they manage to fill that much disk space, I wonder.)
Any idea how to best package it?
We could of course have a ‘clang-full’ package, but it seems wasteful.
We could also have a separate output for the extra commands, but it’s
inconvenient. It would be ideal to have a ‘clang-tools-extra’ package
that depends on ‘clang’, but building them separately appears to be
impossible.
Thanks in advance! :-)
Ludo’.
¹ https://releases.llvm.org/10.0.0/tools/clang/tools/extra/docs/index.html
[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/x-patch, Size: 3114 bytes --]
diff --git a/gnu/packages/llvm.scm b/gnu/packages/llvm.scm
index d6c519bcbd..a3bcd75190 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/llvm.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/llvm.scm
@@ -166,7 +166,11 @@ compiler. In LLVM this library is called \"compiler-rt\".")
(supported-systems (delete "mips64el-linux" %supported-systems))))
(define* (clang-from-llvm llvm clang-runtime hash
- #:key (patches '()))
+ #:key (patches '()) tools-extra)
+ "Produce Clang with dependencies on LLVM and CLANG-RUNTIME, and applying the
+given PATCHES. When TOOLS-EXTRA is given, it must point to the
+'clang-tools-extra' tarball, which contains code for 'clang-tidy', 'pp-trace',
+'modularize', and other tools."
(package
(name "clang")
(version (package-version llvm))
@@ -187,7 +191,10 @@ compiler. In LLVM this library is called \"compiler-rt\".")
(inputs
`(("libxml2" ,libxml2)
("gcc-lib" ,gcc "lib")
- ,@(package-inputs llvm)))
+ ,@(package-inputs llvm)
+ ,@(if tools-extra
+ `(("clang-tools-extra" ,tools-extra))
+ '())))
(propagated-inputs
`(("llvm" ,llvm)
("clang-runtime" ,clang-runtime)))
@@ -208,6 +215,19 @@ compiler. In LLVM this library is called \"compiler-rt\".")
#:build-type "Release"
#:phases (modify-phases %standard-phases
+ ,@(if tools-extra
+ `((add-after 'unpack 'add-tools-extra
+ (lambda* (#:key inputs #:allow-other-keys)
+ (let ((extra (assoc-ref inputs
+ "clang-tools-extra")))
+ (invoke "tar" "xf" extra)
+ (rename-file ,(string-append
+ "clang-tools-extra-"
+ (package-version llvm)
+ ".src")
+ "tools/extra")
+ #t))))
+ '())
(add-after 'unpack 'add-missing-triplets
(lambda _
;; Clang iterates through known triplets to search for
@@ -376,7 +396,16 @@ output), and Binutils.")
(define-public clang-10
(clang-from-llvm llvm-10 clang-runtime-10
"08fbxa2a0kr3ni35ckppj0kyvlcyaywrhpqwcdrdy0z900mhcnw8"
- #:patches '("clang-10.0-libc-search-path.patch")))
+ #:patches '("clang-10.0-libc-search-path.patch")
+ #:tools-extra
+ #f
+ #;(origin
+ (method url-fetch)
+ (uri (llvm-download-uri "clang-tools-extra"
+ (package-version llvm-10)))
+ (sha256
+ (base32
+ "074ija5s2jsdn0k035r2dzmryjmqxdnyg4xwvaqych2bazv8rpxc")))))
(define-public clang-toolchain-10
(make-clang-toolchain clang-10))
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: Packaging ‘clang-tools-extra’ (‘clang-tidy’, etc.)
2020-04-24 13:36 Packaging ‘clang-tools-extra’ (‘clang-tidy’, etc.) Ludovic Courtès
@ 2020-04-24 17:07 ` Nikita Gillmann
2020-04-27 7:31 ` Ludovic Courtès
2020-05-29 16:57 ` Ludovic Courtès
1 sibling, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Nikita Gillmann @ 2020-04-24 17:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ludovic Courtès; +Cc: guix-devel
Ludovic Courtès transcribed 4.9K bytes:
> Hello!
>
> The patch below produces a ‘clang’ package that contains
> ‘clang-tools-extra’ commands¹.
>
[...]
> Any idea how to best package it?
>
> We could of course have a ‘clang-full’ package, but it seems wasteful.
> We could also have a separate output for the extra commands, but it’s
> inconvenient. It would be ideal to have a ‘clang-tools-extra’ package
> that depends on ‘clang’, but building them separately appears to be
> impossible.
Is it? The way we build clang and clang-tools-extra in pkgsrc is to
have them separate.
Refer to lang/clang-tools-extra and lang/clang to see how.
The gist is, BUILD_TARGET for clang-tools-extra gets overridden
and appended with targets to build.
That'S just after skipping through the clang-tools-extra package
for a minute.
I'm not sure if this is applicable to guix in any way.
> Thanks in advance! :-)
>
> Ludo’.
>
> ¹ https://releases.llvm.org/10.0.0/tools/clang/tools/extra/docs/index.html
>
> diff --git a/gnu/packages/llvm.scm b/gnu/packages/llvm.scm
> index d6c519bcbd..a3bcd75190 100644
> --- a/gnu/packages/llvm.scm
> +++ b/gnu/packages/llvm.scm
> @@ -166,7 +166,11 @@ compiler. In LLVM this library is called \"compiler-rt\".")
> (supported-systems (delete "mips64el-linux" %supported-systems))))
>
> (define* (clang-from-llvm llvm clang-runtime hash
> - #:key (patches '()))
> + #:key (patches '()) tools-extra)
> + "Produce Clang with dependencies on LLVM and CLANG-RUNTIME, and applying the
> +given PATCHES. When TOOLS-EXTRA is given, it must point to the
> +'clang-tools-extra' tarball, which contains code for 'clang-tidy', 'pp-trace',
> +'modularize', and other tools."
> (package
> (name "clang")
> (version (package-version llvm))
> @@ -187,7 +191,10 @@ compiler. In LLVM this library is called \"compiler-rt\".")
> (inputs
> `(("libxml2" ,libxml2)
> ("gcc-lib" ,gcc "lib")
> - ,@(package-inputs llvm)))
> + ,@(package-inputs llvm)
> + ,@(if tools-extra
> + `(("clang-tools-extra" ,tools-extra))
> + '())))
> (propagated-inputs
> `(("llvm" ,llvm)
> ("clang-runtime" ,clang-runtime)))
> @@ -208,6 +215,19 @@ compiler. In LLVM this library is called \"compiler-rt\".")
> #:build-type "Release"
>
> #:phases (modify-phases %standard-phases
> + ,@(if tools-extra
> + `((add-after 'unpack 'add-tools-extra
> + (lambda* (#:key inputs #:allow-other-keys)
> + (let ((extra (assoc-ref inputs
> + "clang-tools-extra")))
> + (invoke "tar" "xf" extra)
> + (rename-file ,(string-append
> + "clang-tools-extra-"
> + (package-version llvm)
> + ".src")
> + "tools/extra")
> + #t))))
> + '())
> (add-after 'unpack 'add-missing-triplets
> (lambda _
> ;; Clang iterates through known triplets to search for
> @@ -376,7 +396,16 @@ output), and Binutils.")
> (define-public clang-10
> (clang-from-llvm llvm-10 clang-runtime-10
> "08fbxa2a0kr3ni35ckppj0kyvlcyaywrhpqwcdrdy0z900mhcnw8"
> - #:patches '("clang-10.0-libc-search-path.patch")))
> + #:patches '("clang-10.0-libc-search-path.patch")
> + #:tools-extra
> + #f
> + #;(origin
> + (method url-fetch)
> + (uri (llvm-download-uri "clang-tools-extra"
> + (package-version llvm-10)))
> + (sha256
> + (base32
> + "074ija5s2jsdn0k035r2dzmryjmqxdnyg4xwvaqych2bazv8rpxc")))))
>
> (define-public clang-toolchain-10
> (make-clang-toolchain clang-10))
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: Packaging ‘clang-tools-extra’ (‘clang-tidy’, etc.)
2020-04-24 17:07 ` Nikita Gillmann
@ 2020-04-27 7:31 ` Ludovic Courtès
2020-04-27 8:50 ` Efraim Flashner
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Ludovic Courtès @ 2020-04-27 7:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: guix-devel
Hi!
Nikita Gillmann <nikita@n0.is> skribis:
> Is it? The way we build clang and clang-tools-extra in pkgsrc is to
> have them separate.
> Refer to lang/clang-tools-extra and lang/clang to see how.
> The gist is, BUILD_TARGET for clang-tools-extra gets overridden
> and appended with targets to build.
Nice. Do you have the URL of the build recipe?
Thanks,
Ludo’.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: Packaging ‘clang-tools-extra’ (‘clang-tidy’, etc.)
2020-04-27 7:31 ` Ludovic Courtès
@ 2020-04-27 8:50 ` Efraim Flashner
2020-04-27 11:23 ` Nikita Gillmann
2020-05-05 10:21 ` Ludovic Courtès
0 siblings, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Efraim Flashner @ 2020-04-27 8:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ludovic Courtès; +Cc: guix-devel
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 843 bytes --]
On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 09:31:01AM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Nikita Gillmann <nikita@n0.is> skribis:
>
> > Is it? The way we build clang and clang-tools-extra in pkgsrc is to
> > have them separate.
> > Refer to lang/clang-tools-extra and lang/clang to see how.
> > The gist is, BUILD_TARGET for clang-tools-extra gets overridden
> > and appended with targets to build.
>
> Nice. Do you have the URL of the build recipe?
>
> Thanks,
> Ludo’.
>
Here's a link to the Github mirror of pkgsrc for clang-tools-extra
https://github.com/NetBSD/pkgsrc/blob/trunk/lang/clang-tools-extra/Makefile
--
Efraim Flashner <efraim@flashner.co.il> אפרים פלשנר
GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351
Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: Packaging ‘clang-tools-extra’ (‘clang-tidy’, etc.)
2020-04-27 8:50 ` Efraim Flashner
@ 2020-04-27 11:23 ` Nikita Gillmann
2020-05-05 10:21 ` Ludovic Courtès
1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Nikita Gillmann @ 2020-04-27 11:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Efraim Flashner; +Cc: guix-devel, Ludovic Courtès
Hi,
Efraim Flashner transcribed 1.9K bytes:
> On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 09:31:01AM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > Nikita Gillmann <nikita@n0.is> skribis:
> >
> > > Is it? The way we build clang and clang-tools-extra in pkgsrc is to
> > > have them separate.
> > > Refer to lang/clang-tools-extra and lang/clang to see how.
> > > The gist is, BUILD_TARGET for clang-tools-extra gets overridden
> > > and appended with targets to build.
> >
> > Nice. Do you have the URL of the build recipe?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Ludo’.
> >
>
> Here's a link to the Github mirror of pkgsrc for clang-tools-extra
> https://github.com/NetBSD/pkgsrc/blob/trunk/lang/clang-tools-extra/Makefile
http://cvsweb.netbsd.org/bsdweb.cgi/pkgsrc/lang/clang-tools-extra/#dirlist
http://cvsweb.netbsd.org/bsdweb.cgi/pkgsrc/lang/clang/
or navigating the (improve worthy) http://pkgsrc.se
But yeah github mirror should work out, or
https://anonhg.netbsd.org/pkgsrc/file/tip/lang/clang
https://anonhg.netbsd.org/pkgsrc/file/tip/lang/clang-tools-extra
> --
> Efraim Flashner <efraim@flashner.co.il> אפרים פלשנר
> GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351
> Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: Packaging ‘clang-tools-extra’ (‘clang-tidy’, etc.)
2020-04-27 8:50 ` Efraim Flashner
2020-04-27 11:23 ` Nikita Gillmann
@ 2020-05-05 10:21 ` Ludovic Courtès
1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Ludovic Courtès @ 2020-05-05 10:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Efraim Flashner; +Cc: guix-devel
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 526 bytes --]
Hello!
Clang-tools-extra is really meant to built within the Clang tree.
Attach is an attempt to build it out-of-tree but so far it fails with
undefined references for Clang libraries and the obvious solution of
adding ‘-l’ flags until it’s happy doesn’t work.
In my original attempt, the ‘clang-tidy’ binary is 40 MiB, and 32 MiB
are text. This prolly comes from the fact that many Clang libraries
(libclang[A-Z]*.a) are statically linked in each of these programs.
Ideas welcome!
Ludo’.
[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/x-patch, Size: 4041 bytes --]
diff --git a/gnu/packages/llvm.scm b/gnu/packages/llvm.scm
index 33d863ae11..896b7afb47 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/llvm.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/llvm.scm
@@ -382,6 +382,52 @@ output), and Binutils.")
(define-public clang-toolchain-10
(make-clang-toolchain clang-10))
+(define (make-clang-tools-extra clang)
+ ;; XXX: An attempt to build clang-tools-extra outside the Clang tree.
+ (package
+ (inherit clang)
+ (name "clang-tools-extra")
+ (source (origin
+ (method url-fetch)
+ (uri (llvm-download-uri "clang-tools-extra"
+ (package-version llvm-10)))
+ (sha256
+ (base32
+ "074ija5s2jsdn0k035r2dzmryjmqxdnyg4xwvaqych2bazv8rpxc"))
+ (patches (search-patches "clang-tools-extra-cmake.patch"))))
+ (arguments
+ '(#:build-type "Release"
+ #:phases (modify-phases %standard-phases
+ (add-before 'configure 'copy-clang-cmake-module
+ (lambda* (#:key inputs #:allow-other-keys)
+ (let ((clang-source (assoc-ref inputs "clang-source")))
+ (mkdir "../clang-source")
+ (with-directory-excursion "../clang-source"
+ (invoke "tar" "xf" clang-source))
+
+ ;; 'cmake/modules' is in the search path of the
+ ;; top-level 'CMakeLists.txt', so copy it there.
+ (install-file (car (find-files "../clang-source"
+ "^AddClang\\.cmake$"))
+ "cmake/modules")
+ #t)))
+ (add-before 'build 'augment-header-path
+ (lambda _
+ (let ((context-h (car (find-files "../clang-source"
+ "^Context\\.h$"))))
+ (setenv "CPATH"
+ (string-append (dirname
+ (canonicalize-path context-h))
+ ":" (getenv "CPATH")))
+ #t))))))
+ (inputs
+ `(("clang" ,clang)
+ ("clang-source", (package-source clang))
+ ,@(package-inputs clang)))))
+
+(define-public clang-tools-extra-10
+ (make-clang-tools-extra clang-10))
+
(define-public llvm-9
(package
(inherit llvm-10)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/patches/clang-tools-extra-cmake.patch b/gnu/packages/patches/clang-tools-extra-cmake.patch
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..96672bb2dd
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gnu/packages/patches/clang-tools-extra-cmake.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
+diff --git a/CMakeLists.txt b/CMakeLists.txt
+index 57bb970..6e5de7c 100644
+--- a/CMakeLists.txt
++++ b/CMakeLists.txt
+@@ -1,3 +1,33 @@
++cmake_minimum_required(VERSION 3.4.3)
++
++project(Clang-Tools-Extra)
++
++find_package(LLVM REQUIRED HINTS "${LLVM_CMAKE_PATH}")
++list(APPEND CMAKE_MODULE_PATH ${LLVM_DIR})
++
++# This is the place where we put Clang's 'AddClang.cmake'.
++list(APPEND CMAKE_MODULE_PATH "${CMAKE_CURRENT_SOURCE_DIR}/cmake/modules")
++
++set(LLVM_TOOLS_BINARY_DIR ${TOOLS_BINARY_DIR} CACHE PATH "Path to llvm/bin")
++set(LLVM_LIBRARY_DIR ${LIBRARY_DIR} CACHE PATH "Path to llvm/lib")
++set(LLVM_MAIN_INCLUDE_DIR ${INCLUDE_DIR} CACHE PATH "Path to llvm/include")
++set(LLVM_BINARY_DIR ${LLVM_OBJ_ROOT} CACHE PATH "Path to LLVM build tree")
++set(LLVM_MAIN_SRC_DIR ${MAIN_SRC_DIR} CACHE PATH "Path to LLVM source tree")
++
++set(PACKAGE_VERSION "${LLVM_PACKAGE_VERSION}")
++
++include(AddClang)
++include(AddLLVM)
++include(TableGen)
++include(HandleLLVMOptions)
++include(VersionFromVCS)
++include(LLVMDistributionSupport)
++
++# Dummy targets to appease CMake. These are normally found in the
++# Clang tree.
++add_custom_target(clang-resource-headers)
++add_custom_target(ClangSACheckers)
++
+ include(CMakeDependentOption)
+
+ add_subdirectory(clang-apply-replacements)
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: Packaging ‘clang-tools-extra’ (‘clang-tidy’, etc.)
2020-04-24 13:36 Packaging ‘clang-tools-extra’ (‘clang-tidy’, etc.) Ludovic Courtès
2020-04-24 17:07 ` Nikita Gillmann
@ 2020-05-29 16:57 ` Ludovic Courtès
1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Ludovic Courtès @ 2020-05-29 16:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: guix-devel
Hi,
Ludovic Courtès <ludovic.courtes@inria.fr> skribis:
> The patch below produces a ‘clang’ package that contains
> ‘clang-tools-extra’ commands¹.
>
> The problem is the size. Before:
>
> $ guix size /gnu/store/qxdpxbvfdxfy5dnz4haql4xlxpmb5r6b-clang-10.0.0 |tail -1
> total: 995.2 MiB
> $ guix size /gnu/store/qxdpxbvfdxfy5dnz4haql4xlxpmb5r6b-clang-10.0.0 |head -2
> store item total self
> /gnu/store/qxdpxbvfdxfy5dnz4haql4xlxpmb5r6b-clang-10.0.0 995.2 456.5 45.9%
>
>
> After:
>
> $ guix size /gnu/store/5h3xgpg33wip2b8ccri690jp6ikbq16s-clang-10.0.0 |tail -1
> total: 1525.4 MiB
> $ guix size /gnu/store/5h3xgpg33wip2b8ccri690jp6ikbq16s-clang-10.0.0 |head -2
> store item total self
> /gnu/store/5h3xgpg33wip2b8ccri690jp6ikbq16s-clang-10.0.0 1525.4 986.8 64.7%
>
> (How they manage to fill that much disk space, I wonder.)
>
> Any idea how to best package it?
>
> We could of course have a ‘clang-full’ package, but it seems wasteful.
> We could also have a separate output for the extra commands, but it’s
> inconvenient. It would be ideal to have a ‘clang-tools-extra’ package
> that depends on ‘clang’, but building them separately appears to be
> impossible.
After spending an unreasonable amount of time trying to build
‘clang-tools-extra’ as a separate package, I gave up and went for the
multiple output solution in commit
77a87ad4aceed9d89d615540e0fd147e3a8b2f64. One can now get ‘clang-tidy’
and its friends with:
guix install clang:extra
Ludo’.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2020-05-29 16:58 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-04-24 13:36 Packaging ‘clang-tools-extra’ (‘clang-tidy’, etc.) Ludovic Courtès
2020-04-24 17:07 ` Nikita Gillmann
2020-04-27 7:31 ` Ludovic Courtès
2020-04-27 8:50 ` Efraim Flashner
2020-04-27 11:23 ` Nikita Gillmann
2020-05-05 10:21 ` Ludovic Courtès
2020-05-29 16:57 ` Ludovic Courtès
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.