From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id mCiVOyKXSmC9CgAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 11 Mar 2021 22:18:10 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id cLxQNyKXSmB+UgAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 11 Mar 2021 22:18:10 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AA206251BD for ; Thu, 11 Mar 2021 23:18:10 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1]:52770 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lKTdB-00045I-Ol for larch@yhetil.org; Thu, 11 Mar 2021 17:18:09 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:35576) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lKTd4-00044Z-MG for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Mar 2021 17:18:02 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:43740) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lKTd4-0003uB-F9 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Mar 2021 17:18:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lKTd4-0008CD-Aj for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Mar 2021 17:18:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#47027] Disarchive package Resent-From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2021 22:18:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 47027 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Leo Prikler Cc: Timothy Sample , 47027@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 47027-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B47027.161550105530985 (code B ref 47027); Thu, 11 Mar 2021 22:18:02 +0000 Received: (at 47027) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Mar 2021 22:17:35 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55286 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lKTcd-00083V-GD for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 11 Mar 2021 17:17:35 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:45376) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lKTcb-0007zR-TL for 47027@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 11 Mar 2021 17:17:34 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:33047) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lKTcV-0003Ux-HP; Thu, 11 Mar 2021 17:17:27 -0500 Received: from [2a01:e0a:1d:7270:af76:b9b:ca24:c465] (port=56984 helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1lKTcT-0000Ap-Fu; Thu, 11 Mar 2021 17:17:26 -0500 From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= References: <20210309193925.15447-1-samplet@ngyro.com> <20210309193925.15447-2-samplet@ngyro.com> <6c09a18a2f23bc093eecaae17fc9b007847ef14b.camel@student.tugraz.at> Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2021 23:17:24 +0100 In-Reply-To: <6c09a18a2f23bc093eecaae17fc9b007847ef14b.camel@student.tugraz.at> (Leo Prikler's message of "Wed, 10 Mar 2021 11:23:44 +0100") Message-ID: <87eeglwd1n.fsf_-_@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1615501090; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:resent-cc: resent-from:resent-sender:resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post; bh=fhkG7Au4ZXpPUEtV850Fo7ra0pjh1k/eRt0KEGCtvj0=; b=s2HYGhpHcuPuIvoduGvvEds1IafXeHjy6iRtpN3TJhJvwhLtVxlDQWTDHDs8+81sXksVPX CdksUwzBeGAZH85IHumgYkFFryf3+nXJoiNlvkfKcMpRUhgg9uOUmialR9EJv6JeddgcP3 V0WksnqWsA+PudgZ0jvsid7GsINzcs0jQnlepg35q7LYlfTYp7Rn2+CAwRwQ17jGwT40el /c65LvARZXeGKSpKsIxShf+l34/1lmer40imyscQ84OeIOOcW6D5uHA5zTmWYtcmcgeQfp c9UofJuGj71pSvRpS8GhEnMINYp7neLbs/grrJPS0zGKcPnk/2nxLI3Th2J1sA== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1615501090; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=MWBO0SSc5IdlAm4CLR3wTaDrRu81PhdPe2ljJDprLPqDl1FJBpzTPf+z3Xro9X+Npl2H+o sSmkAujhNg9kWDG7jeWyNlD7MHZxLQnXfJ8UHcXfHrDjvxniDlHKmIAXKsF4uTCRzGbekp tdQE9zue6AEd9iEQDK6fpisW4DjyzXACoKnyjBjB/VcVtF4C/4uwZ/lacFiTlAAvA07aR/ C0OiA08Wcdgd0vcbRUJDXvIzZQscGT01TQvGMVgfv0+BlIxilUOh4cTZGOYdbeIPzV6bUs jFwl7r37VxxMaTwJ5E1lNJQY0B2W+XKmtsYgsOV1KjwaSutxSsRvjK0wn3CyNA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -2.89 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: AA206251BD X-Spam-Score: -2.89 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-TUID: NToRPOdcdV8F Hi! Leo Prikler skribis: > I've checked and the package seems to build fine with Guile 3.0.2. I > think the bytecode mismatch happens, because Guix compiles stuff with > 3.0.2 by default, but users have 3.0.5 in their system, which is not > bytecode-compatible. (As an exception, Guix itself seems to be > compiled with Guile 3.0.5 for performance reasons). > > I think it would be fine to add with Guile 3.0.2, perhaps adding a note > that Guile 3.0.5 will effectively be required to use Guix interop? If > not, could you provide a script, that breaks in a way other than > recompiling the mismatching code? I tend to agree here: I don=E2=80=99t think =E2=80=98guile-3.0-latest=E2=80= =99 is needed in this case. The only case where you need it is if it depends on a library, such as Guix, that is itself built with =E2=80=98guile-3.0-latest=E2=80=99. > As far as the location is concerned, I personally do not like adding > too many single-package files. Would it make sense to add this to > compression.scm (like gzip) or backup.scm (like libarchive)? Maybe there=E2=80=99ll be other packages eventually in archival.scm, like t= he SWH Python code? It=E2=80=99s fine with me, but I don=E2=80=99t have a str= ong opinion. Ludo=E2=80=99.