From: "Ludovic Courtès" <ludo@gnu.org>
To: Mathieu Othacehe <othacehe@gnu.org>
Cc: 58732@debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#58732: installer: finalizers & device destroy segfault
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2022 12:42:20 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87edubjasj.fsf@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87tu38m9oc.fsf@gnu.org> (Mathieu Othacehe's message of "Wed, 09 Nov 2022 16:25:55 +0100")
Hi,
Mathieu Othacehe <othacehe@gnu.org> skribis:
> I tested it out and I had several SCM pointers encapsulating the same
> libparted C pointer, thus multiple finalizers on the same underlying C
> pointer.
Yes, that’s the idea I tried to convey.
> Anyway, here is a patch that solves the issue by removing the device
> finalizer. It also means that all devices are persisted until the end of
> the program which doesn't feel right, but I cannot think of a better
> solution.
Looking at device.c in Parted, that’s probably the right thing because
PedDevice objects are kept in a linked list whose head is stored in the
‘devices’ global variable of device.c. So you cannot just free them
asynchronously from a finalizer thread because they might still be
accessed from other parts of the library. This is the explanation that
should go in the comment, and it’s clearly a good reason not to free
those PedDevice objects.
Now, we could provide bindings for ‘ped_device_destroy’ that users could
explicitly call if they want to (this would be similar to explicit calls
to ‘close-port’). We’d arrange to make it idempotent.
Thanks,
Ludo’.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-10 11:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-10-23 9:07 bug#58732: installer: finalizers & device destroy segfault Mathieu Othacehe
2022-11-02 10:55 ` Ludovic Courtès
2022-11-03 11:09 ` Mathieu Othacehe
2022-11-03 11:25 ` Ludovic Courtès
2022-11-06 17:17 ` Mathieu Othacehe
2022-11-07 13:29 ` Ludovic Courtès
2022-11-07 16:37 ` Mathieu Othacehe
2022-11-09 15:25 ` Mathieu Othacehe
2022-11-10 11:42 ` Ludovic Courtès [this message]
2022-11-10 12:29 ` Mathieu Othacehe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87edubjasj.fsf@gnu.org \
--to=ludo@gnu.org \
--cc=58732@debbugs.gnu.org \
--cc=othacehe@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.