From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp11.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:306:2d92::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms9.migadu.com with LMTPS id 4CvXOvie0GSEVQEASxT56A (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 07 Aug 2023 09:36:25 +0200 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:306:2d92::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp11.migadu.com with LMTPS id UA7LOvie0GQOWQEA9RJhRA (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 07 Aug 2023 09:36:24 +0200 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9C85930E8B for ; Mon, 7 Aug 2023 09:36:24 +0200 (CEST) Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=inria.fr header.s=dc header.b=hPr2QW8+; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=inria.fr (policy=none) ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1691393784; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=s/0UhUg0NZL0rh/jMKfv3zAvO9/eNLA2cPxKr6cL+rWJ5w8RD0VfHPEjm1tYstUaz1jSy+ r350zjc5ZjhdkOQm37YBAsBtE7S0zKQ+ClAUXuoRj1/4W462HLiAcCJ/XWWVIlvr7qopO1 3MNiqwKegmxdixJsLgKGONocEAarrQsj7dK+zu+fRIzukcftRkRNteX78/86KV2Fho9bCZ 6CC2PpcxbgfP1a4EzGGoSSxFmEv5WuTraNeHB41et8zXAfk0qE1xhOS6vv7hZClxgknjk7 OYy+zHLW21iHKkfFaS4tW36mTGpILqjepgZXSPfwIBzDMy7B0gXzFv2VP9gpFw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1691393784; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:resent-cc: resent-from:resent-sender:resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=TWqI9EV4ThQLNgw+yiMJHKuFIIN+LDAnnQqu8lwLlyQ=; b=bINjTT/Cf2a/H+7JCe3Y7O0/BWOaUjThqifTyC270wj59VuxpZvQy/zJdUZ43TclU+0pR2 b/QqzlWy8jNdE0lxN3hAVrx6HYVFKqy/5mIxD/LXLRQpS5CyWoKZNLI3T5ImExQOGaUPL3 c5lMulbRGt/FXyyi3wyloudSSTqlKkzad8bt85n1m5MkTTRJtN4uwKwN6euuhyaBUCV+KJ AD8ytELIXhuwcdWxCo+FAkTPIIcrHmrICKsYgegey202GsWg1nZunbON77k1kPcpEgv7YC H4tb6Y99//fVLSJgey0noqcr8R5VixV4y2UGoItD9fkClIE2LmLv01bsvxAnRg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=inria.fr header.s=dc header.b=hPr2QW8+; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=inria.fr (policy=none) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qSumZ-0006ZC-Pp; Mon, 07 Aug 2023 03:36:04 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qSumY-0006Z2-0k for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Aug 2023 03:36:02 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qSumX-0001Lv-OO for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Aug 2023 03:36:01 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qSumX-000561-Jv for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Aug 2023 03:36:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#64593: =?UTF-8?Q?=E2=80=98guix?= system =?UTF-8?Q?image=E2=80=99?= fails to create image while invoking =?UTF-8?Q?=E2=80=98grub-bios-setup=E2=80=99?= Resent-From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 07 Aug 2023 07:36:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 64593 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Josselin Poiret Cc: 64593@debbugs.gnu.org, yann.dupont@univ-nantes.fr, sarg@sarg.org.ru X-Debbugs-Original-Cc: 64593@debbugs.gnu.org, Yann Dupont , Sergey Trofimov , debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 64593-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B64593.169139374819570 (code B ref 64593); Mon, 07 Aug 2023 07:36:01 +0000 Received: (at 64593) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Aug 2023 07:35:48 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60476 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qSumH-00055M-Rk for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 07 Aug 2023 03:35:47 -0400 Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr ([192.134.164.83]:50518) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qSumD-00054x-Uh; Mon, 07 Aug 2023 03:35:43 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=inria.fr; s=dc; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to: message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=TWqI9EV4ThQLNgw+yiMJHKuFIIN+LDAnnQqu8lwLlyQ=; b=hPr2QW8+/WqFPqT1k6sNZpiwkhhgZGc6oa3lJr4YvmVE4i11K63KAU+R j3gIieDhCMg5apeVY2aLCghW77qIm2rlL/zxaKCIXnK75xMopl2gB+h7i NXGRtK7LiOuOoF422oZFME4ndeRlcIQaN26jq80lJkrmzYZk7qJv6cbDs Y=; X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.01,261,1684792800"; d="scan'208";a="120356161" Received: from unknown (HELO ribbon) ([193.50.110.195]) by mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 07 Aug 2023 09:35:36 +0200 From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= References: <87sf9syx3m.fsf@inria.fr> <871qh56p84.fsf@sarg.org.ru> <87v8ege1f8.fsf@jpoiret.xyz> X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: =?UTF-8?Q?D=C3=A9cadi?= 20 Thermidor an 231 de la =?UTF-8?Q?R=C3=A9volution,?= jour de =?UTF-8?Q?l'=C3=89cluse?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x090B11993D9AEBB5 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4 0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5 X-OS: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Date: Mon, 07 Aug 2023 09:35:36 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87v8ege1f8.fsf@jpoiret.xyz> (Josselin Poiret's message of "Wed, 19 Jul 2023 10:43:55 +0200") Message-ID: <87edkfxq2f.fsf@inria.fr> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -5.25 X-Migadu-Scanner: mx2.migadu.com X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 9C85930E8B X-Spam-Score: -5.25 X-TUID: EfjbwY4fHoQ+ Hi, Josselin Poiret skribis: > Sergey Trofimov writes: > >> shouldn't it be `(bootloader grub-efi-bootloader)` if you're=20 >> building a `efi-raw` image? >> With efi grub it builds and boots just fine, as I've tested before=20 >> submitting the patch. > > I think I agree with you that you should expect efi images to use efi > bootloaders. The efi-raw image name is a bit misleading I would argue, > since the image type doesn't decide what bootloader is used, and using a > BIOS bootloader with an efi image seems a bit weird. The fact that it's > used as the default image type is a bit troubling though, so we could > add a new default image type that uses MBR, so that BIOS bootloaders > work with it. Yes, we could do that. I guess my confusion stems from the fact that the default image type changed to EFI recently (right?). Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99.