From: Vagrant Cascadian <vagrant@debian.org>
To: "pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" <pelzflorian@pelzflorian.de>,
Matt <matt@excalamus.com>
Cc: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com>,
Christian Miller <christian.miller@dadoes.de>,
guix-devel <guix-devel@gnu.org>,
Josselin Poiret <dev@jpoiret.xyz>
Subject: Re: doc: Removing much of Binary Installation (was: Feedback of the GNU Guix manual)
Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2024 13:29:23 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87edcn1230.fsf@wireframe> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87zfvbgu3q.fsf_-_@pelzflorian.de>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1831 bytes --]
On 2024-03-06, pelzflorian (Florian Pelz) wrote:
> I don’t feel qualified to judge, but is this the preference? Arch wiki
> advises against the Arch AUR package: “Therefore, after updating Guix
> once, the AUR advantage really turns into a disadvantage, as there will
> be many unnecessary files in the /usr file tree that are part of the
> Guix AUR package but that are never used by Guix anymore. Therefore,
> consider using the manual installation.” [0]
>
> The reason of existence for these distribution packages is probably
> similar to the reason why the Binary Installation section exists.
Indeed, after the first guix pull, most of the packaged files are no
longer used.
As the one who packaged and maintains guix in Debian, my main motivation
was and is to have a trust path from debian; mainly not having to
manually verify the signatures of the manual installation method (I
would hazard to guess that the percentage of people who actually do
manually verify signatures is disturbingly small).
The guix-daemon should continue to work from the packaged version,
although as guix develops more and more features; how long an old
version can be expected to continue to work remains an open question.
I cannot say I have done a *great* job at maintaining guix in Debian,
but hopefully at least a passable job. Although there are some annoying
things that probably need to be fixed:
https://bugs.debian.org/1064748
a.k.a.
https://issues.guix.gnu.org/69518
... or backported to Debian stable:
https://bugs.debian.org/1036304
https://bugs.debian.org/1038916
I have found a fair number of issues (especially typos!) to fix in
upstream guix as a result of packaging it for Debian, so if nothing
else, it is some quality assurance! :)
live well,
vagrant
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 227 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-06 21:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 69+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-14 15:01 Feedback of the GNU Guix manual Christian Miller
2024-01-15 17:52 ` Matt
2024-01-15 22:05 ` Christian Miller
2024-01-18 19:44 ` Maxim Cournoyer
2024-01-19 21:01 ` Matt
2024-01-26 23:59 ` Matt
2024-02-18 12:35 ` Matt
2024-02-18 13:55 ` Josselin Poiret
2024-02-21 18:27 ` Matt
2024-02-21 17:20 ` Maxim Cournoyer
2024-02-21 18:36 ` Matt
2024-02-23 2:46 ` Maxim Cournoyer
2024-02-23 18:37 ` Matt
2024-03-02 13:34 ` Matt
2024-03-06 17:15 ` doc: Removing much of Binary Installation (was: Feedback of the GNU Guix manual) pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)
2024-03-06 19:42 ` Matt
2024-03-06 20:52 ` doc: Removing much of Binary Installation Suhail Singh
2024-03-06 21:18 ` Suhail Singh
2024-03-07 17:03 ` pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)
2024-03-10 11:09 ` doc: installation: fix ~root confusion (was Re: doc: Removing much of Binary Installation) Matt
2024-03-10 20:42 ` Vagrant Cascadian
2024-03-10 23:21 ` Suhail Singh
2024-03-11 1:58 ` Vagrant Cascadian
2024-03-11 4:27 ` John Kehayias
2024-03-11 19:15 ` Vagrant Cascadian
2024-03-11 15:54 ` pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)
2024-03-16 10:47 ` Matt
2024-03-16 14:05 ` pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)
2024-03-17 17:34 ` Ludovic Courtès
2024-03-24 9:27 ` [bug#69977] [PATCH] doc: doc-Simplify installation instructions (was Re: doc: installation: fix ~root confusion (was Re: doc: Removing much of Binary Installation)) Matt
2024-03-24 9:32 ` [bug#69976] " Matt
[not found] ` <87edbitv7l.fsf@gmail.com>
2024-04-07 8:30 ` bug#69977: " pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)
2024-04-10 2:57 ` [bug#69977] " Maxim Cournoyer
2024-03-25 19:26 ` [bug#69977] [PATCH] doc: doc-Simplify installation instructions pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)
2024-04-06 8:06 ` Matt
2024-03-06 21:29 ` Vagrant Cascadian [this message]
2024-04-10 14:05 ` Fix grammar and markup (was Re: Feedback of the GNU Guix manual) Matt
2024-04-11 12:59 ` Christian Miller
2024-04-12 14:41 ` pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)
2024-04-12 19:18 ` Matt
2024-04-13 12:02 ` pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)
2024-04-14 7:00 ` pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)
2024-04-19 14:09 ` Creating a documentation team? Ludovic Courtès
2024-04-19 15:32 ` Maxim Cournoyer
2024-04-19 17:32 ` pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)
2024-04-20 8:33 ` Matt
2024-05-01 20:34 ` Ludovic Courtès
2024-05-02 9:14 ` pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)
2024-05-07 17:57 ` [bug#70823] [PATCH] " Matt
2024-05-11 13:03 ` bug#70823: " pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)
2024-04-12 20:16 ` Fix grammar and markup (was Re: Feedback of the GNU Guix manual) Ludovic Courtès
2024-04-13 8:22 ` Matt
2024-04-13 11:26 ` pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)
2024-04-14 14:50 ` Matt
2024-04-15 12:58 ` pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)
2024-04-15 18:39 ` Matt
2024-04-16 6:43 ` pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)
2024-04-18 17:15 ` Matt
2024-04-19 20:56 ` pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)
2024-04-20 8:36 ` Matt
2024-04-17 18:08 ` Maxim Cournoyer
2024-04-22 18:25 ` [PATCH] Fix typo (Re: " Matt
2024-04-22 22:43 ` pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)
2024-05-07 19:41 ` [PATCH] doc: Clarify need to update search paths on foreign distro (was " Matt
2024-05-07 20:41 ` Vagrant Cascadian
2024-05-10 9:57 ` Matt
2024-05-11 8:14 ` pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)
2024-05-26 19:47 ` Matt
2024-08-09 11:03 ` (No) new profiles section in the manual (was Re: [PATCH] doc: Clarify need to update search paths on foreign distro (was Re: Feedback of the GNU Guix manual)) pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87edcn1230.fsf@wireframe \
--to=vagrant@debian.org \
--cc=christian.miller@dadoes.de \
--cc=dev@jpoiret.xyz \
--cc=guix-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=matt@excalamus.com \
--cc=maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com \
--cc=pelzflorian@pelzflorian.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.