From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andreas Enge Subject: Obsolete packages listed as available Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2013 14:21:44 +0100 Message-ID: <201301031421.44877.andreas@enge.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Boundary-01=_oXY5QMxqoxDMKu9" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:34585) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tqkk7-0006Gi-HC for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Jan 2013 08:21:59 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tqkk1-0005rS-6q for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Jan 2013 08:21:55 -0500 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.17.9]:56207) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tqkk0-0005rN-Sv for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Jan 2013 08:21:49 -0500 List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: bug-guix@gnu.org --Boundary-01=_oXY5QMxqoxDMKu9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hello, when executing guix-package --list-available | grep mit I see two packages: mit-krb5 1.11 distro/packages/mit-krb5.scm:29:3 mit-krb5 1.11 distro/packages/sasl.scm:145:3 The first one is the really available one; the second one was contained in a file sasl.scm in an old branch. Both the file and the branch have been deleted in the meantime. However, I suppose the package exists still somewhere in the nix store. Is this listing of obsolete packages a bug or a feature? Andreas --Boundary-01=_oXY5QMxqoxDMKu9 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Hello,

when executing

guix-package --list-available | grep mit

I see two packages:

mit-krb5 1.11 distro/packages/mit-krb5.scm:29:3

mit-krb5 1.11 distro/packages/sasl.scm:145:3

The first one is the really available one; the second one was contained in a file sasl.scm in an old branch. Both the file and the branch have been deleted in the meantime. However, I suppose the package exists still somewhere in the nix store.

Is this listing of obsolete packages a bug or a feature?

Andreas

--Boundary-01=_oXY5QMxqoxDMKu9-- From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: Re: Obsolete packages listed as available Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 15:49:33 +0100 Message-ID: <87d2xm5nk2.fsf@gnu.org> References: <201301031421.44877.andreas@enge.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:50056) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tqm7D-0007ZT-Vu for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Jan 2013 09:49:52 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tqm7D-0004bj-1W for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Jan 2013 09:49:51 -0500 Received: from mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr ([192.134.164.105]:59236) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tqm7C-0004bb-RG for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Jan 2013 09:49:50 -0500 In-Reply-To: <201301031421.44877.andreas@enge.fr> (Andreas Enge's message of "Thu, 3 Jan 2013 14:21:44 +0100") List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Andreas Enge Cc: bug-guix@gnu.org Hi, Andreas Enge skribis: > when executing > guix-package --list-available | grep mit > I see two packages: > mit-krb5 1.11 distro/packages/mit-krb5.scm:29:3 > mit-krb5 1.11 distro/packages/sasl.scm:145:3 > > The first one is the really available one; the second one was contained i= n=20 > a file sasl.scm in an old branch. Both the file and the branch have been= =20 > deleted in the meantime. However, I suppose the package exists still=20 > somewhere in the nix store. I suppose the file sasl.scm still exists along with the other files. Even if it=E2=80=99s not under version control, the module-listing code in distro.scm will stumble upon it, and thus list any packages that it exports. If you remove that file, it will no longer show up. HTH, Ludo=E2=80=99. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andreas Enge Subject: Re: Obsolete packages listed as available Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2013 17:37:10 +0100 Message-ID: <201301031737.10550.andreas@enge.fr> References: <201301031421.44877.andreas@enge.fr> <87d2xm5nk2.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Boundary-01=_2Ob5Qx+qAQKfuH/" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:44407) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TqnnC-000573-DN for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Jan 2013 11:37:21 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tqnn9-0001r9-Ix for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Jan 2013 11:37:18 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87d2xm5nk2.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Ludovic =?utf-8?q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: bug-guix@gnu.org --Boundary-01=_2Ob5Qx+qAQKfuH/ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Am Donnerstag, 3. Januar 2013 schrieb Ludovic Court=C3=A8s: > I suppose the file sasl.scm still exists along with the other files. > Even if it=E2=80=99s not under version control, the module-listing code in > distro.scm will stumble upon it, and thus list any packages that it > exports. Yes and no - it still existed in the guix installation directory, but not=20 in the source directory. After removing it, the extra package disappeared.= =20 Thanks! Would it make sense to first empty $PREFIX/share/guile/site/2.0 before=20 installing the files during "make install"? Andreas --Boundary-01=_2Ob5Qx+qAQKfuH/ Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Am Donnerst= ag, 3. Januar 2013 schrieb Ludovic Court=C3=A8s:

> I supp= ose the file sasl.scm still exists along with the other files.

> Even i= f it=E2=80=99s not under version control, the module-listing code in

> distro= =2Escm will stumble upon it, and thus list any packages that it

> export= s.

&nb= sp;

Yes and no = =2D it still existed in the guix installation directory, but not in the sou= rce directory. After removing it, the extra package disappeared. Thanks!

&nb= sp;

Would it ma= ke sense to first empty $PREFIX/share/guile/site/2.0 before installing the = files during "make install"?

&nb= sp;

Andreas

&nb= sp;

--Boundary-01=_2Ob5Qx+qAQKfuH/-- From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: Re: Obsolete packages listed as available Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 19:39:16 +0100 Message-ID: <87fw2i157v.fsf@gnu.org> References: <201301031421.44877.andreas@enge.fr> <87d2xm5nk2.fsf@gnu.org> <201301031737.10550.andreas@enge.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:39666) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tqpjp-00036v-Ck for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Jan 2013 13:41:58 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tqpjo-0003wf-Ch for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Jan 2013 13:41:57 -0500 Received: from mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr ([192.134.164.105]:46437) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tqpjo-0003wW-5P for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Jan 2013 13:41:56 -0500 In-Reply-To: <201301031737.10550.andreas@enge.fr> (Andreas Enge's message of "Thu, 3 Jan 2013 17:37:10 +0100") List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Andreas Enge Cc: bug-guix@gnu.org Andreas Enge skribis: > Would it make sense to first empty $PREFIX/share/guile/site/2.0 before=20 > installing the files during "make install"? I don=E2=80=99t think so, that=E2=80=99s not what usually happens upon =E2= =80=9Cmake install=E2=80=9D. Ludo=E2=80=99.