From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
Subject: Re: Gegl build failures
Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2014 19:05:11 +0100
Message-ID: <87d28fcdrc.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <20141120181246.GA15990@debian.math.u-bordeaux1.fr>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37903)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1XsF3e-00040d-Nd
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Nov 2014 13:05:23 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1XsF3Z-0007BU-VA
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Nov 2014 13:05:18 -0500
In-Reply-To: <20141120181246.GA15990@debian.math.u-bordeaux1.fr> (Andreas
	Enge's message of "Thu, 20 Nov 2014 19:12:46 +0100")
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr>, John Darrington <jmd@gnu.org>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr> skribis:

> gegl, an input for gimp, fails its tests:
>    http://hydra.gnu.org/build/159641/nixlog/1/tail-reload
>
> We already have the following comments in the package:
>           ;; This test program seems to crash on exit. Specifically, whil=
st
>           ;; g_object_unreffing bufferA and bufferB - This seems to be a =
bug
>           ;; in the destructor.  This is just a test program so will not =
have
>           ;; any wider effect, although might be hiding another problem.
>           ;; According to advice received on irc.gimp.org#gegl although 0=
.2.0
>           ;; is the latest released version, any bug reports against it w=
ill
>           ;; be ignored.  So we are on our own.
> before a line that removes one test. I would suggest to disable all tests.

That sounds reasonable, but since John did the initial investigation and
discussed with GEGL people, I=E2=80=99d like to know what he thinks.

Thanks,
Ludo=E2=80=99.