From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Mark H Weaver <mhw@netris.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] gnu: Add vte.
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 04:10:26 -0500
Message-ID: <87d27k2c59.fsf@yeeloong.lan>
References: <1418535265-17233-1-git-send-email-iyzsong@gmail.com>
	<874msyfhob.fsf@izanagi.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me>
	<87bnn5mbkz.fsf@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33132)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mhw@netris.org>) id 1Y0oBF-0007cf-8V
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 04:12:38 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mhw@netris.org>) id 1Y0oB6-0000H6-MA
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 04:12:33 -0500
Received: from world.peace.net ([50.252.239.5]:38627)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mhw@netris.org>) id 1Y0oB6-0000Gu-IC
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 04:12:24 -0500
In-Reply-To: <87bnn5mbkz.fsf@gmail.com> (=?utf-8?B?IuWui+aWh+atpiIncw==?=
	message of "Mon, 15 Dec 2014 18:50:04 +0800")
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: =?utf-8?B?5a6L5paH5q2m?= <iyzsong@gmail.com>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

=E5=AE=8B=E6=96=87=E6=AD=A6 <iyzsong@gmail.com> writes:

> David Thompson <dthompson2@worcester.edu> writes:
>> Maybe call this one 'vte-gtk2'?  'vte-0' isn't very descriptive.
> Basically, I intend to use the version of pc file,
> for example, I have libwnck-1, which has libwnck-1.0.pc.
>
> Yes, this does make sense, but 'vte-gtk2' is look like another package,
> how about 'vte/gtk+-2'?

Package names cannot match the regexp "-[0-9]", because when
'package-name->name+version' in (guix utils) finds such a match, it
interprets the part after the "-" as a version number.  So if you run
"guix package -i vte/gtk+-2", it will look for version "2" of a package
named "vte/gtk+".

     Mark