From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark H Weaver Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add ninja. Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2015 19:31:02 -0500 Message-ID: <87d26iyzi1.fsf@netris.org> References: <1420810817-23613-1-git-send-email-iyzsong@gmail.com> <87fvbk3tvy.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34247) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YBBrD-0006qL-Qp for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 19:30:48 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YBBr8-0003A0-Qy for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 19:30:47 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87fvbk3tvy.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic \=\?utf-8\?Q\?Court\=C3\=A8s\=22'\?\= \=\?utf-8\?Q\?s\?\= message of "Fri, 09 Jan 2015 15:34:25 +0100") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) writes: > =E5=AE=8B=E6=96=87=E6=AD=A6 skribis: > >> * gnu/packages/ninja.scm: New file. >> * gnu-system.am (GNU_SYSTEM_MODULES): Add it. > > [...] > >> + 'check >> + (lambda _ >> + (and (zero? (system "./configure.py")) >> + (zero? (system "./ninja ninja_test")) >> + ;; SubprocessTest.InterruptChild fail when using 'syst= em*'. >> + ;; SubprocessTest.SetWithLots was skipped. >> + ;; XXX: Raise [ulimit -n] well above 1025 to make this= test go. > > Does it mean that the test is currently failing? This test failed during the core-updates x86_64 build on Hydra. We get: [166/183] SubprocessTest.InterruptChild *** Failure in src/subprocess_test.cc:83 ExitInterrupted =3D=3D subproc->Finish() In the hopes that it might be a transient failure, I restarted the build, but the second time it failed in the same place. See: http://hydra.gnu.org/build/201077/nixlog/1/raw http://hydra.gnu.org/build/201077/nixlog/2/raw It seems that using 'system' instead of 'system*' wasn't enough to make it work reliably. Can you take another look? Thanks for your contributions! Mark