From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark H Weaver Subject: Re: Gnupg 2.1.11 Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2016 15:59:17 -0500 Message-ID: <87d1scxkd6.fsf@netris.org> References: <20160204152848.GA4379@debian> <87r3gs9zvf.fsf@gnu.org> <20160204193649.GA8785@debian> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56625) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aRQzw-0001ug-UO for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Feb 2016 15:59:29 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aRQzs-000074-UA for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Feb 2016 15:59:28 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20160204193649.GA8785@debian> (Andreas Enge's message of "Thu, 4 Feb 2016 20:36:49 +0100") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Andreas Enge Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org It eventually built successfully, and we've learned more recently. See https://bugs.gnu.org/22558 for further discussion on this issue. Thanks, Mark