From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chris Marusich Subject: bug#23200: XFCE: selecting a style has no effect Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2016 21:19:47 -0700 Message-ID: <87d1q4661o.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87oa9r65w6.fsf@gmail.com> <87vb3zyykp.fsf@elephly.net> <87y48us0wr.fsf@gmail.com> <871t6ldss0.fsf@gnu.org> <87wpod9hac.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40422) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1anITF-0002iK-IC for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Apr 2016 00:20:06 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1anITC-00077s-7h for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Apr 2016 00:20:05 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:54441) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1anITC-00077o-3w for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Apr 2016 00:20:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1anITB-0002Vc-WE for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Apr 2016 00:20:02 -0400 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <87wpod9hac.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic \=\?utf-8\?Q\?Court\=C3\=A8s\=22'\?\= \=\?utf-8\?Q\?s\?\= message of "Mon, 04 Apr 2016 23:48:43 +0200") List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: 23200-done@debbugs.gnu.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) writes: > ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) skribis: > >> I=E2=80=99ve tested that with this patch changing colors under the =E2= =80=9CStyle=E2=80=9D tab >> in Xfce does have an effect. >> >> I=E2=80=99ll commit it shortly if there are no objections. > > Pushed a slightly different version as > ae05e366bea4517f1e428799f00f11997ccef661. This fixed the issue for me. Thanks! =2D-=20 Chris --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJXAzzlAAoJEN1AmhXYIkadts4P/1MIWfy0qJOgLtSiZTy9ynqj 6QYqULzQwWvwpins+JWHzGp44R7tHkD70iy7pB37ZqRyBzAwl6r1lS3BzPwg241x aACfgh/WXnN2vyT6fSaBY7I0qMRaX01+8/EGbfgHxEiTFe6b9qR88g774rDvELSs mRWYTfbR5BVc9u/EdogLeshd+Y6rB5vpDTMC3vy9MD60DkHk+8GGd9s8cnXXQ+bi hRxv9RDJuQOVkjqMPj5RXRNfrQVFNt9zc5jNsOCOe2+eZZtoU3vUm+MRvmfyZQcT UJWjfdGs3fkcClbd4Elew0vj/dfcA+uzJqw9S1Wijk7vlxpL0NWG/ShFZARpGbAc sfsFWtMnwLtMfmwwP8Rpcf9aM++bVilHJaAhjVMwmbeawgHECZ1aTM8qqPoOs9xJ XTtyvhZT6+06g1KHvteqjBiSEEnrvQ8i4OoxCR6Tj0lh630LpjrzrGTtVSI6wYux HzC0KaB3T92RzcAo3F5wRiChsczLnjP0wIHtFnfikfJGok049KAZ4jd1SWhTLUWH nGYkp2NxXPqXUzi1DcNQJWFP2WnlBHo4jZCyPLzuWi2mL6VOj7wLZNsf5sYaDE1W I+KqUltqP2n0yH9jn23TOQzx9tS3dNpxt7u0hEF6PcN8Y2EOYqvan1fAD1Dt277b XMJaSRgsl5XpwuGoe9N+ =oMnz -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--