From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: Re: Gnome-updates Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2016 16:58:47 +0200 Message-ID: <87d1pb14k8.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20160426173717.GA4754@solar> <87potb19ih.fsf@gnu.org> <87r3dr3yyc.fsf@member.fsf.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44461) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1avQvW-0001PV-5T for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Apr 2016 10:58:59 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1avQvS-0005iy-Vs for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Apr 2016 10:58:54 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87r3dr3yyc.fsf@member.fsf.org> (=?utf-8?B?IuWui+aWh+atpiIn?= =?utf-8?B?cw==?= message of "Wed, 27 Apr 2016 22:31:39 +0800") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: =?utf-8?B?5a6L5paH5q2m?= Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org iyzsong@member.fsf.org (=E5=AE=8B=E6=96=87=E6=AD=A6) skribis: > ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) writes: > >> Andreas Enge skribis: >> >>> the gnome-updates branch has built on x86, and compared to master, ther= e are >>> not that many regressions: >>> http://hydra.gnu.org/eval/108921?compare=3Dmaster#tabs-now-fail >> >> In fact this slightly overestimates the failures compared to master; in >> particular, all the Octave/Fltk-related failures are already in master. >> >>> I saw a few that seem to be related to fonts and freetype, but I am not >>> a specialist. Do you think we could nevertheless merge back to master? >>> In any case, it would be nice if people who are competent in these matt= ers >>> could have a look at the few remaining build failures. >> >> Since =E2=80=98make assert-binaries-available=E2=80=99 passed, I went ah= ead and merge >> the branch. > Oh, luckily the merge doesn't have effect. >> >> If anything goes wrong, please let us know! > Sorry, this is still not ready yet!=20 Indeed! I screwed things up in two ways: I didn=E2=80=99t revert the rever= ts, meaning the merge had not effect, and because of this, I failed to realize that things that were broken before were still broken. My bad! Specifically, Mark told me that at least these important packages fail to build: evolution-data-server, gedit, gnome-control-center, gnome-session, gtkmm, totem, mupdf. > I have skip a gjs test temporary, and disable the spell plugin of > gedit. I'd continue to work on the gnome-updates branch, and will > reply to this thread when it's ok. OK! Thanks, and sorry all for the mess! Ludo=E2=80=99.