From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: bug#23217: xboing bugs Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2016 10:05:13 +0200 Message-ID: <87d1pama4m.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20160404184735.GC3934@protected.rcdrun.com> <871t6ftcax.fsf@gmail.com> <20160416064753.GA25965@gnu.org> <87r3e33rig.fsf@gnu.org> <20160418201404.GA17099@gnu.org> <87twix7v17.fsf@gnu.org> <20160427201403.GB30439@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53568) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1avgyY-0006x2-VB for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Apr 2016 04:07:07 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1avgyT-0005FW-Uy for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Apr 2016 04:07:06 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:38793) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1avgyT-0005FP-RF for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Apr 2016 04:07:01 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1avgyT-0001DO-K9 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Apr 2016 04:07:01 -0400 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20160427201403.GB30439@gnu.org> (John Darrington's message of "Wed, 27 Apr 2016 16:14:03 -0400") List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: John Darrington Cc: Alex Kost , 23217@debbugs.gnu.org, Jean Louis John Darrington skribis: > On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 12:27:48PM +0200, Ludovic Court??s wrote: >> John Darrington skribis: >>=20 >> > On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 04:45:11PM +0200, Ludovic Court??s wrote: >> >> John Darrington skribis: >> >>=20 >> >> > You have to run it with the -usedefcmap option. Then it works >> >> > just fine. >> >>=20 >> >> Can we improve on this or should we close the bug? >> >>=20 >> > >> > I see that debian has some quite extensive patches to Xboing,=20 >> > which seems to fix this issue and many others. >> > >> > Should we purloin them? >>=20 >> I would suggest taking only those that fix serious bugs such as this >> one. WDYT? > > It depends on what you consider as serious. Some of them fix potential > buffer overflows. Debian considers that a serious bug. I would consider =E2=80=9Cserious=E2=80=9D any fixes for security bugs and = for bugs that make it inconvenient or impossible to use the software, such as the -usedefcmap issue above. Ludo=E2=80=99.