From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
Subject: Re: chroot/aarch64 issues
Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2016 16:44:15 +0200
Message-ID: <87d1msw3eo.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <20160704104248.GA32334@debian-netbook> <87h9c5ed87.fsf@gnu.org>
	<20160704141514.GB32334@debian-netbook> <87oa6czd4w.fsf@gnu.org>
	<20160705122848.GE6523@debian-netbook>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47766)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1bKRaI-0005AX-Sq
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Jul 2016 10:44:23 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1bKRaE-0007FZ-Ew
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Jul 2016 10:44:21 -0400
In-Reply-To: <20160705122848.GE6523@debian-netbook> (Efraim Flashner's message
	of "Tue, 5 Jul 2016 15:28:48 +0300")
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Efraim Flashner <efraim@flashner.co.il>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

Efraim Flashner <efraim@flashner.co.il> skribis:

> On Tue, Jul 05, 2016 at 10:45:51AM +0200, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote:
>> Efraim Flashner <efraim@flashner.co.il> skribis:
>>=20
>> > On Mon, Jul 04, 2016 at 03:37:12PM +0200, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote:
>> >> Hi!
>>=20
>> If the kernel config corresponds to this kernel, I don=E2=80=99t see whi=
ch of
>> the other EINVAL reasons given in clone(2) would apply.  Does =E2=80=98d=
mesg=E2=80=99
>> show something?
>>=20
>> Could you maybe try a C program that invokes clone(2) and progressively
>> remove CLONE_ flags until you find the one that=E2=80=99s causing EINVAL?
>>=20
>> Thanks,
>> Ludo=E2=80=99.
>
> I grabbed the code from man 2 clone and ran that on the odroid, which
> told me "clone: Operation not permitted"

This is expected; quoth clone(2):

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
 EPERM  CLONE_NEWIPC, CLONE_NEWNET, CLONE_NEWNS, CLONE_NEWPID, or CLONE_NEW=
UTS was specified by an unprivi=E2=80=90
        leged process (process without CAP_SYS_ADMIN).
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

Can you try running it as root?

Ludo=E2=80=99.