From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mathieu Lirzin Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] gnu: atlas: Use cpupower in description. Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2016 23:47:39 +0200 Message-ID: <87d1m95mh0.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20160719024520.9121-1-me@tobias.gr> <20160719024520.9121-3-me@tobias.gr> <8760s1e42x.fsf@gnu.org> <524055e2b85bfd9b153f173afcc0a024@tobias.gr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59093) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bPcrp-0007iZ-LC for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Jul 2016 17:47:54 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bPcrn-0005Ss-M1 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Jul 2016 17:47:52 -0400 In-Reply-To: <524055e2b85bfd9b153f173afcc0a024@tobias.gr> (Tobias Geerinckx-Rice's message of "Tue, 19 Jul 2016 23:33:40 +0200") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Tobias Geerinckx-Rice writes: > Ludo', > > On 2016-07-19 23:00, ludo@gnu.org wrote: >> Applied, thanks! > > Thanks! I didn't know about @example. > > It seems like some Texinfo syntax is encouraged (like @command), but > not the full set (package descriptions are full of abbreviations, > but no @abbr or @acronym anywhere). Is this by design? Nope it is not by design, the Guile (texinfo ...) modules just don't implement these commands from GNU Texinfo, but should indeed. -- Mathieu Lirzin