From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
To: Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Removing the attic package
Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2016 10:20:36 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87d1kirc4r.fsf@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160904184416.GB29947@jasmine> (Leo Famulari's message of "Sun, 4 Sep 2016 14:44:16 -0400")
Hi!
Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> skribis:
> I don't want to steer new users towards this broken software, and I
> think removing the package is a safe choice. Current Attic users could
> continue to use it, because it won't be removed from their profile
> unless they do `guix package --remove attic`.
Since, AIUI, Borg is a compatible “continuation” of Attic, it makes
sense to remove Attic.
I had an idea to use a ‘superseded’ entry in ‘properties’ that would
tell ‘guix package’ et al. to upgrade to the new package:
(package
(name "attic")
;; …
(properties `((superseded . ,borg))))
ENOSYS, though.
> And Borg can convert Attic repos for users who are interested in
> moving on, so these users will not lose access to their data even if
> they do uninstall Attic on their machines.
>
> Do we have any guidelines about "retiring" packages?
Not yet!
Of course there’s a fine line here: we cannot systematically retire
packages “just” because they have bugs (all of them do ;-)). So we have
to be cautious. In this case, it can be considered a serious bug in the
package’s core functionality, *and* there’s a fix provided by a fork, so
I see no obstacle in removing it.
What do people think?
Thanks,
Ludo’.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-09-05 8:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-09-04 2:12 Removing the attic package Leo Famulari
2016-09-04 13:10 ` ng0
2016-09-04 18:44 ` Leo Famulari
2016-09-05 8:20 ` Ludovic Courtès [this message]
2016-09-05 8:34 ` Ricardo Wurmus
2016-09-05 9:29 ` Efraim Flashner
2016-09-05 10:05 ` ng0
2016-09-05 10:20 ` ng0
2016-09-06 21:36 ` Superseded packages Ludovic Courtès
2016-09-10 17:25 ` Leo Famulari
2016-09-11 13:46 ` Ludovic Courtès
2016-09-11 15:19 ` Leo Famulari
2016-09-11 20:39 ` Ludovic Courtès
2016-09-20 21:18 ` Leo Famulari
2016-09-24 2:14 ` Ludovic Courtès
2016-09-25 16:42 ` Leo Famulari
2016-09-26 9:44 ` Efraim Flashner
2016-09-27 21:39 ` Leo Famulari
2016-09-28 8:44 ` Ludovic Courtès
2016-09-28 17:58 ` Leo Famulari
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87d1kirc4r.fsf@gnu.org \
--to=ludo@gnu.org \
--cc=guix-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=leo@famulari.name \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.