From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alex Kost Subject: Re: gnu: abbaye: Update to 2.0.1 from new repository. Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2017 22:58:09 +0300 Message-ID: <87d1ezdp2m.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87d1foe8n3.fsf@openmailbox.org> <87efzxmyd6.fsf@gmail.com> <87lgu2j65y.fsf@openmailbox.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43877) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cZjzq-0002At-1f for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Feb 2017 14:58:15 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cZjzn-0007SH-11 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Feb 2017 14:58:14 -0500 Received: from mail-lf0-x243.google.com ([2a00:1450:4010:c07::243]:33019) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cZjzm-0007Qf-Qd for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Feb 2017 14:58:10 -0500 Received: by mail-lf0-x243.google.com with SMTP id x1so2336627lff.0 for ; Fri, 03 Feb 2017 11:58:10 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87lgu2j65y.fsf@openmailbox.org> (Adonay Felipe Nogueira's message of "Mon, 23 Jan 2017 10:46:01 -0200") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Adonay Felipe Nogueira Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Adonay Felipe Nogueira (2017-01-23 10:46 -0200) wrote: > Hi all! :) > > About my copyright notice: I try to always expose alternative ways with > which people can reach me, from less varying to most varying. OK, I see that your other commits also have this libreplanet URL in the copyright line, so I left it. > About suggestion to use tarball snapshots instead of git-fetch: That's > interesting, I once read that `guix refresh` would behave better with > git-fetch methods than with url-fetch methods. But, as I found out > recently, it does seem that git-fetch imposes heavy load due to the > current innability to make shallow clones. So I'm now waiting for > others' input in this matter: Should I reformat the patch such that > url-fetch is used instead? I modified it to use the tarball and applied as efc12a8, thanks! and sorry for the delay. -- Alex