From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ricardo Wurmus Subject: Re: gst-plugins-base: Test suite failed: FAIL: elements/opus Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2018 22:48:38 +0200 Message-ID: <87d0wltc9l.fsf@elephly.net> References: <877emvj5uv.fsf@gmail.com> <8736xig8zu.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <20180620161145.GA2236@jasmine.lan> <87d0wle8o8.fsf@gmail.com> <20180620163618.GA1100@jasmine.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41307) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fVk2H-0001eh-Be for help-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Jun 2018 16:49:06 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fVk2C-0001uh-G0 for help-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Jun 2018 16:49:01 -0400 Received: from sender-of-o51.zoho.com ([135.84.80.216]:21009) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fVk2C-0001tr-4C for help-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Jun 2018 16:48:56 -0400 In-reply-to: <20180620163618.GA1100@jasmine.lan> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-guix-bounces+gcggh-help-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Help-Guix" To: Leo Famulari Cc: help-guix , Nicolas Goaziou Leo Famulari writes: > On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 06:15:19PM +0200, Pierre Neidhardt wrote: >> I'm till seeing this problem. >> >> > guix --version >> guix (GNU Guix) d39c9efa11168f5a441ac60b3ed486f2ac0b4c73 >> >> > guix pull -l >> # ... >> Generation 2 Jun 19 2018 14:10:01 (current) >> guix d39c9ef >> repository URL: https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guix.git >> branch: origin/master >> commit: d39c9efa11168f5a441ac60b3ed486f2ac0b4c73 >> >> >> I'm on a x86_64 machine with kernel 4.14.33. > > Okay, are you able to send a patch to disable the test and report this > issue upstream? On i686 the test fails with a segfault. I would be uncomfortable with disabling the test before we understand the cause of the segfault. It may be better to remove libopus complete if it turns out that one could trigger the segfault at runtime, outside of the test context. -- Ricardo