From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christopher Baines Subject: Re: Ruby 2.5, pushing to staging? Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2018 22:16:12 +0100 Message-ID: <87d0se6f37.fsf@cbaines.net> References: <87in2g0zlm.fsf@cbaines.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33700) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gB4nD-0008FR-JI for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Oct 2018 17:16:20 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gB4n8-0001HM-Pk for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Oct 2018 17:16:19 -0400 Received: from mira.cbaines.net ([2a01:7e00::f03c:91ff:fe69:8da9]:49054) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gB4n8-0001Ff-Iu for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Oct 2018 17:16:14 -0400 In-reply-to: <87in2g0zlm.fsf@cbaines.net> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: 32871@debbugs.gnu.org Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Christopher Baines writes: > A new minor version of Ruby has been out for a while, and it would be > good to get Ruby 2.5 in to Guix. > > I've put up a patch here [1], and tried it locally. I've pushed some > fixes to master to make some packages compatible [2], and while I do get > some failures when building the 958 (according to guix refresh -l) > dependant packages, I'm unsure how many of these are down to the Ruby > upgrade. > > 1: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=32871 > 2: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=32870 > > Anyway, looking at the contributing guide this is possibly too big of a > change to push directly to master, so should I push this to the staging > branch? I've now gone ahead and pushed to staging. Not really sure what happens now.... will berlin and hydra pick this up automatically, and start building packages? --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQKTBAEBCgB9FiEEPonu50WOcg2XVOCyXiijOwuE9XcFAlvBDxxfFIAAAAAALgAo aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldDNF ODlFRUU3NDU4RTcyMEQ5NzU0RTBCMjVFMjhBMzNCMEI4NEY1NzcACgkQXiijOwuE 9Xcrcg/9GbgTHAZx+/2DdRqjIWmV0j04vY89p8b1KjLVPZFJslBtwFx/0NGtqpsK hOFbNZ8TtA3MXWzvaD6OlZQ3ThtgKYadZ+/pOMmACUvuU2YwrqD2Imyj7iOjhXI2 Z2XXnV8HHdYKNMKAZ53uVr1Rh5ILRpu6B10rfjcQ3cYNgSJLrKy8hx22x9OV4aRm JERFeSYv104F/bKx/Rqot0NuHwvy/OMe1/UwflKmv2M3qUjKP0HqDrzn4Gm5Hf9B WryPR7L8NlzYFnw3/a6XYUHzqpAvGOuy5NAErzvAfBh2tIGhXRGuZzZD3E9+TSR6 70xpD1242t2lqvFcQXABmj4b48EWlmf3x2uiG72xtlsDEfcrI9OZ8I0mpajQuUz7 NV6gAaszcTSERoK/f/rxfl0KAi9+BMVbaSWbpcGspA5t+zea1Ru9kvUaGXbNj5y1 oT4IR8the2D6MNCxQxvios3dl62v8fwKDL3ghX9cpLYRstVT9Kc3K1o8h+1Zsjbe XzVQepQZuvBOasMao2HRkwyb54SJZBJbYLe+U6C0v1RRNKrTcuwTN4A0tPaEvdMM 6EM0tNEPnbwUjeGXADMWltTtipTyy5J8yUS5TG887werJ2HoBNUJlNduJN32U8bF hoq9gF7iAcB2FZjS2+3iBm1/I/HsWVDNioRrRxSmqZm9x49lwGs= =9YrQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--