From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: collect2: fatal error: cannot find 'ld'
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2019 16:53:30 +0100
Message-ID: <87d0mxv24l.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <LYHFyoS--3-1@tutanota.com> <87wom9kp1q.fsf@elephly.net>
	<CAJ3okZ1MZWT6sxzFgv+Op9wGsHL-wvqROMPRz5B_QpXMkYE_fQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<87r2celejh.fsf@elephly.net> <87va1pgdn0.fsf@gnu.org>
	<87tvh8ir2d.fsf@elephly.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <help-guix-bounces+gcggh-help-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:46578)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1h3NGJ-0006QH-0f
	for help-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Mar 2019 11:54:47 -0400
In-Reply-To: <87tvh8ir2d.fsf@elephly.net> (Ricardo Wurmus's message of "Tue,
	12 Feb 2019 23:23:54 +0100")
List-Id: <help-guix.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/help-guix>,
	<mailto:help-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/help-guix/>
List-Post: <mailto:help-guix@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:help-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-guix>,
	<mailto:help-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: help-guix-bounces+gcggh-help-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Help-Guix" <help-guix-bounces+gcggh-help-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net>
Cc: Help Guix <help-guix@gnu.org>

Hello!

Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net> skribis:

> Ludovic Court=C3=A8s <ludo@gnu.org> writes:
>
>> Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net> skribis:
>>
>>> I still think that we should hide the plain gcc packages on the command
>>> line.
>>
>> Agreed.
>
> Is this the right way to hide the package (see patch)?  I searched for
> GCC on the command line with =E2=80=9Cguix package --search=3Dgcc=E2=80=
=9D and the results
> did not include the plain gcc packages.

It still includes the =E2=80=98gcc-toolchain=E2=80=99 packages, right?

> From 8cbb0b446930264b7f2a771cc95534e14dde9edd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net>
> Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2019 23:21:48 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: gcc-4.7: Hide package.
>
> * gnu/packages/gcc.scm (gcc-4.7): Wrap in "hidden-package" expression.

Alternately you could simply add a =E2=80=98properties=E2=80=99 field (with=
 a comment),
which would make the diff smaller.

Go for it!

Thanks,
Ludo=E2=80=99.