From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:58687)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1i9shY-0005hC-0Y
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 11:14:04 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1i9shW-0003aD-UT
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 11:14:03 -0400
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:41997)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
 (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
 id 1i9shW-0003a5-O7
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 11:14:02 -0400
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1i9shW-00029p-HU
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 11:14:02 -0400
Subject: [bug#36467] [PATCH v3] gnu: Add some Common Lisp libraries
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.36467.B36467.15686467838221@debbugs.gnu.org>
From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@gnu.org>
References: <20190701222716.12254-1-glv@posteo.net>
 <handler.36467.B.15620201228378.ack@debbugs.gnu.org>
 <87imr7rak9.fsf@yamatai> <87blw018x7.fsf@gnu.org>
 <87y2yopqln.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87h85ctjoe.fsf@yamatai>
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2019 17:12:52 +0200
In-Reply-To: <87h85ctjoe.fsf@yamatai> (Guillaume Le Vaillant's message of
 "Mon, 16 Sep 2019 16:11:45 +0200")
Message-ID: <87d0g06zrf.fsf@gnu.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
List-Id: <guix-patches.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-patches>,
 <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-patches>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-patches@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-patches>,
 <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-patches" <guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org>
To: Guillaume Le Vaillant <glv@posteo.net>
Cc: Katherine Cox-Buday <cox.katherine.e@gmail.com>, Pierre Neidhardt <mail@ambrevar.xyz>, 36467@debbugs.gnu.org

Hi Guillaume & Pierre,

Guillaume Le Vaillant <glv@posteo.net> skribis:

> However some "ecl-" packages can't be built
> right now because of a dependency that fails to build

We discussed whether to add =E2=80=9Cecl-=E2=80=9D packages in the first pl=
ace a couple
of months ago IIRC, and I think the outcome was that it=E2=80=99s not worth=
 it
most of the time.  Do I remember correctly Katherine, Pierre?

So maybe you shouldn=E2=80=99t even bother with =E2=80=9Cecl-=E2=80=9D pack=
ages at all.

Thanks,
Ludo=E2=80=99.