Re: Clarifying blog post licensing

[Vagrant Cascadian <vagrant@debian.org>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1095 bytes --]

On 2022-01-26, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> With a few exceptions, our blog posts do not have a license, which is
> not great as it prevents sharing and reuse, at least by those outside
> Guix circles (we discussed it in the past but never got around to fixing
> it).
>
> I’d like us to clarify that, with a footer on blog posts saying that,
> unless otherwise stated, posts are dual-licensed under CC-BY-SA 4.0 and
> GFDL 1.3+ (the latter so we can reuse material in the cookbook and in
> the manual).  Patch below.

Just for clarity, do you mean the GFDL with a laundry-list of non-free
anti-features excluded, like the guix manual:

  Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document
  under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.3 or
  any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with no
  Invariant Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts.

Without that, I'm not sure you can actually include it in the guix
manual (other than, perhaps, by using CC-BY-SA 4.0, maybe)...

live well,
  vagrant

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 227 bytes --]