On 2023-03-12 08:46, Liliana Marie Prikler wrote:

> Am Sonntag, dem 12.03.2023 um 09:18 +0400 schrieb Andrew Tropin:
>> > As for tree-sitter-with/without-gtk, I have no opinion here.  We
>> > could try exporting package rewriters so that everyone can have
>> > their cup of tea, but maintaining one's own Emacs on the
>> > user/channel level ought not to be too difficult either.
>> 
>> I guess inheriting pgtk from tree-sitter looks most logical here: no
>> potential problems for X users, tree-sitter for wayland users. 
>> Updated the inheritance hierarchy.
> For the future, I think we should be careful not to be too close to the
> master branch.  emacs-next has thus far historically been a package to
> try out things for the next release, not the one after that.  The
> inclusion of a package variant with tree-sitter necessitated a change,
> but for packages that don't need it we should go back to tailing pre-
> releases as soon as reasonable.

Sure, I think after the release of emacs-29 we can make emacs-next to
track emacs-30 and deprecate emacs-next-tree-sitter and after emacs-30
release we will include tree-sitter in emacs package itself and also we
will be able to move emacs-next-pgtk to emacs-pgtk.

-- 
Best regards,
Andrew Tropin