From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:303:e16b::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms8.migadu.com with LMTPS id KFAYGvg3qGVPAgAA62LTzQ:P1 (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 17 Jan 2024 21:26:32 +0100 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:303:e16b::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1.migadu.com with LMTPS id KFAYGvg3qGVPAgAA62LTzQ (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 17 Jan 2024 21:26:32 +0100 X-Envelope-To: larch@yhetil.org Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=gmail.com header.s=20230601 header.b=b9TeDUBw; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none) ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1705523192; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:resent-cc: resent-from:resent-sender:resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=e0IQlqnD8RAyS8xu/TdML89fxS9PwLV4+S2qjO0636I=; b=IvhT7G4ud2vNp7WVpIx6IsJC82fK0u4GMgpUvakPPY3iD5GunrnBJXWDH/mQhBnHDIwecO mRcESF3zOVMKUhP6/7qCAbVnjWrMogB039vC+5sHmHz/6nrTZvobHIGiYAG+OxNmScbur3 L07ZMF9NRQIZZ1u06OMML1SOXvGVo1RzIGJ27aCQtPlz3/mnAshoUxRvM/Kjt5kaITxUn6 XjhgkuLClT2ZEOGFgOKqvVTLJtqQ4vV3bA1HoIt6zWv6hT8LFnYdfozU2IhRStDa68bCHb ijbB+SExtiOwODFFLOD+j9i6kynoc0LC+Fpyr14n+Yp63pNPdzBguB7egzPhlQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=gmail.com header.s=20230601 header.b=b9TeDUBw; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none) ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1705523192; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=ow8+n7b+DNutADoOId3wh2SX0P5pWs/BhWz0ItVgn1Ags3U9qQFTZZXqAcxYYbzVsNtdGJ AaPc+gRCj6EPfTBWayIQ89yEesg7a9czOyzTGn0bBn9vtge0pLF1obiXRyN7AfEh0ryJ8E bJcSbGL07Dt5fONxTP23sm9HPVlLK1dbpia/8E8U+idtaFnUy/L5hY/kW9oUNmZZWV/7qq HMvriQnb7bx7mA+oAkEp3K2vVFnnJv8zCFoukOtU++mnm0CbKf5fGDCJTnSUplnw320OZ7 Y3IEd+JoDtrvbHwSO9KuZOPg1beBLnPgQUKjgwts31XptIqzu4zIFter029+Ww== Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 379B317702 for ; Wed, 17 Jan 2024 21:26:32 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rQCUB-0000gt-TX; Wed, 17 Jan 2024 15:26:07 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rQCU6-0000fO-59 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Jan 2024 15:26:02 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rQCU5-0004sH-Jd for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Jan 2024 15:26:01 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rQCU6-00082H-FZ for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Jan 2024 15:26:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#66647: Installation of RPMs produced by =?UTF-8?Q?=E2=80=98guix_?= =?UTF-8?Q?pack=E2=80=99?= is super slow Resent-From: Simon Tournier Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2024 20:26:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 66647 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= , Maxim Cournoyer Cc: =?UTF-8?Q?Lo=C3=AFc?= SIRVIN , 66647@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 66647-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B66647.170552316130881 (code B ref 66647); Wed, 17 Jan 2024 20:26:02 +0000 Received: (at 66647) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Jan 2024 20:26:01 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53579 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rQCU5-000821-5j for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 17 Jan 2024 15:26:01 -0500 Received: from mail-wm1-x336.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::336]:39191) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rQCTz-00081W-Uo for 66647@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 17 Jan 2024 15:25:57 -0500 Received: by mail-wm1-x336.google.com with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-40e60d74b81so3270365e9.1 for <66647@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 17 Jan 2024 12:25:54 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1705523149; x=1706127949; darn=debbugs.gnu.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:references :in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=e0IQlqnD8RAyS8xu/TdML89fxS9PwLV4+S2qjO0636I=; b=b9TeDUBwQ50AR7blD9f9QgnOCXESzOEQKuS9l5YdiPLLL5W50ezeVzBOzuAjxblFpx SUEKk5sc6gVVjKCuN2YjzNcRJdVn5nCxRy/Gwufp+10JcvhixZIYyrEjGBRETAP/XeHs ScK7i1wGJLLWyny99l59FmWjGqNjfoNoZwC7a9GQiOML8w0nH4ixoH1XG3y0eDwLk2ds PbzMt+dne5W1bFa7h1R1k2SK+veq/mDBjZKKjy/yeDsDNn7lEkSzAJopUGAFlxZQD7d0 o+3dzbIVzcArVoV7YNqWeuc2ldY3J7ARH/MuM43veANGwf7F/krBddPXZZ+nycORXuPB 9Ksg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1705523149; x=1706127949; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:references :in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=e0IQlqnD8RAyS8xu/TdML89fxS9PwLV4+S2qjO0636I=; b=bNAplEZsgekM0Ae51tL6EYujNJwsuZ7whJNbm//CFkCaY9XIJ0hCMBMQCBVeF3VG4P XiXLlMEe+in0XAl1nBb5CpxXjjrw4usHdN5pFsj/Czd+StdWQy5pFg6qDbiL6r2l9mjG Zun3OWeIPwU3W4Qw+HbTh4MkGwvFIuM24cUFi84VCHrxu1JjjxFUwCtZuKJ7MWQDHXGn aNitlnl61ATELMg80blN4quoXw7c9rRN/IiIo6NtO6rU05oVPQyRs3Q93Y1qjZi6ay6U IK2ydwX7MH5bn7G/w7rHsXX+ySVckqUzeeQp+zrYVPJmz41T6m2tW8kSydnfGmCkKkfb RPMw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yw1Ta5BR7VDMe3mhGJ3G6UEn+IqzuYyByf4Zn4B4PRIv2RTYxW/ 8N57byDfspkHPR/hNv/jPCY494KIKk0= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFMW5p3/Tu59s8JRyP0nX5HIG9XIxGv0l+GOXILe4uz5cNKpaPTcsU0WMzGdd8SE5fQuZKNMw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:3b16:b0:40d:3ae3:2337 with SMTP id m22-20020a05600c3b1600b0040d3ae32337mr359725wms.2.1705523148997; Wed, 17 Jan 2024 12:25:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from pfiuh07 ([193.48.40.241]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id o18-20020adfcf12000000b00337b55ed9afsm2396632wrj.95.2024.01.17.12.25.48 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 17 Jan 2024 12:25:48 -0800 (PST) From: Simon Tournier In-Reply-To: <87v87vj6yf.fsf@inria.fr> References: <87a5sdvblv.fsf@inria.fr> <5cd008c8-3f9b-4470-b8d2-3e43ff08b4bd@inria.fr> <87r0kseer7.fsf@gmail.com> <874jh96hfo.fsf@gnu.org> <87a5qyatsn.fsf@gmail.com> <87il5g42q0.fsf@gmail.com> <8734v324gz.fsf@gmail.com> <87zfx7qn1q.fsf@gmail.com> <87v87vj6yf.fsf@inria.fr> Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2024 16:21:37 +0100 Message-ID: <87cyu0ugse.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Spam-Score: 2.33 X-Migadu-Scanner: mx13.migadu.com X-Spam-Score: 2.33 X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 379B317702 X-TUID: 0cFWG9rNtmDu Hi, On Mon, 15 Jan 2024 at 10:12, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: >> We could mention that other package managers than yum should be >> preferred in a "@quotation Note", due to a performance problem when >> handling modern RPMs as those made by Guix; or we could close this and >> wait for yum to have become completely irrelevant (which seems like in a >> year or so, last I checked the RHEL end-of-life dates). >> >> Is someone volunteering to add the note? Or should we close this? > > Yeah maybe let=E2=80=99s just a short note warning against old versions o= f =E2=80=98yum=E2=80=99 > and close this issue. I am proposing [1]: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) doc/guix.texi | 8 ++++++++ modified doc/guix.texi @@ -7299,6 +7299,14 @@ Invoking guix pack sudo rpm --install --prefix=3D/opt /gnu/store/...-hello.rpm @end example +@quotation Warning +Rely on @command{rpm --install} for installing an RPM archive and avoid +@command{yum install} or related. The generated RPM archive will +install faster when using @command{rpm} than when using @command{yum}. +The performances of @command{yum} when installing generated RPM archive +could be detrimental compared to installing using @command{rpm} tool. +@end quotation + @quotation Note Contrary to Debian packages, conflicting but @emph{identical} files in RPM packages can be installed simultaneously, which means multiple --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- WDYT? Cheers, simon 1: bug#66647: Installation of RPMs produced by =E2=80=98guix pack=E2=80=99 = is super slow Simon Tournier Tue, 28 Nov 2023 14:31:20 +0100 id:87a5qyatsn.fsf@gmail.com https://issues.guix.gnu.org/66647 https://issues.guix.gnu.org/msgid/87a5qyatsn.fsf@gmail.com https://yhetil.org/guix/87a5qyatsn.fsf@gmail.com