Re: [shepherd] several patches that i deem ready

[Zheng Junjie <zhengjunjie@iscas.ac.cn>]

Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com> writes:

> Hi Attila,
>
> Attila Lendvai <attila@lendvai.name> writes:
>
>>> About "cheaper code path when a log level is disabled at runtime",
>>> perhaps it can be improved in guile-lib, but otherwise that's a nice
>>> list. I just wish we had a good logging library in Guile and could stop
>>> reinventing the wheel left and right.
>>
>>
>> i've made my judgement that the logger in guile-lib was never applied
>> seriously when i relized that it stores the enabled state in a
>> hashtable (which must be looked up for every log statement).
>>
>> i made sure the log statements have a unique syntax, so the underlying
>> machinery can be replaced easily later, and then i moved on.
>
> I guess if we were serious at giving Scheme/Guile a great logging
> library we would try to design it with the help of everyone as a SRFI;
> it could then be integrated to Guile and any other Scheme, benefiting
> the ecosystem at large.  Is this something you could be interested in
> trying?  I've found the Scheme community around SRFIs very knowledgeable
> and helpful.
>

maybe can see srfi-215 Central Log Exchange
[https://srfi.schemers.org/srfi-215/srfi-215.html]?