From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:303:e224::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms13.migadu.com with LMTPS id SJnHOHs/gGdgTwEA62LTzQ:P1 (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 09 Jan 2025 21:28:28 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:303:e224::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1.migadu.com with LMTPS id SJnHOHs/gGdgTwEA62LTzQ (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 09 Jan 2025 22:28:28 +0100 X-Envelope-To: larch@yhetil.org Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=debbugs.gnu.org header.s=debbugs-gnu-org header.b=kja933X5; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=antr.me header.s=zmail header.b="BMqQwK8/"; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=none; arc=reject ("signature check failed: fail, {[1] = sig:zohomail.com:reject}") ARC-Message-Signature: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1736458107; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:resent-cc: resent-from:resent-sender:resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=kOj4ay9aiFJuYyhSSfODp2jAInHiJVTj8lYEQEBYuCM=; b=dDnJXT0XtMJU6xAO9JpTnuUUVUTOqocEpgTu0S423TCWlNSAOpj6oyLbCJJaKw72ZZ/Y0g GxayhjgSWXnPXcQRDhXrbuEI5jCBxHDaYTYbcfdcoLqRp0Dw7RxroCsgH7H4oalYo0keyO 4SdmntgNt4pefp1N32orpWT5W8GxNKNLTwWxlKNsWIPdiAgVMNRgYhwciLUYAL80+IfBTC PeaCKUZF7N9RJ14L7j+8uzpn0K/goUG0QLyHJn2BfJfvz6OIdDAeIEH8xapOBUUyEy6wD5 irIBrsT7rFRzn/ZBhxRt/bEKuPRW8xihsmFgQsjR6eQDllhz/Oa2msieixY+og== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=2; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=debbugs.gnu.org header.s=debbugs-gnu-org header.b=kja933X5; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=antr.me header.s=zmail header.b="BMqQwK8/"; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=none; arc=reject ("signature check failed: fail, {[1] = sig:zohomail.com:reject}") ARC-Seal: i=2; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1736458107; a=rsa-sha256; cv=fail; b=njVvY10clj2rr7cpnL1sKyGbSy/1r1fxs9KEl0/GCRvzC0bXyMkt93N6AjC7sCql5VqK6c RyU8ya31NFo5Dh/SOtxNRwKNqLUF+69cxd85ldhpcEOehdAyMZzWO4wmxyfb5pbTy9FpVm ca7NqRRegLyLslsRrlENt9WDhojY5q4pV8DP93sUg4yDPFo4xSLhPMoF8QgvUvZhy8RLVL lclstJf37zjcwyjwV89rVOoDhzoTdFSnEz7y5vBIvXKgFpVfmBeCbOJLB0lpV2jDLy3qYb LdlFTgzdH5vMuXKf9gWaAJyyK4j+P9X6nOXJ4ZQkB2IU4f9ktlgMk8jc2Cl/Bg== Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 812BF25D6C for ; Thu, 09 Jan 2025 22:28:27 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tW04Y-0004OJ-OO; Thu, 09 Jan 2025 16:28:10 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tW04V-0004OA-Nm for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Jan 2025 16:28:07 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tW04R-0004fp-1X for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Jan 2025 16:28:07 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=debbugs.gnu.org; s=debbugs-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:Date:References:In-Reply-To:From:To:Subject; bh=kOj4ay9aiFJuYyhSSfODp2jAInHiJVTj8lYEQEBYuCM=; b=kja933X56hm5vEOPtFxP8qBqklSxj9pcPObA+Y5EbWh8GAlfc3TlgL4dP3BvdIEjlWzpGB/VnomQ/qCaq9t+14oWsVhCZE6dlAO6BMdV6LVTBSG4di36wetIxOSBuiE60KnFoipGSBBr7t6cLk3Rob6XpC5CM97cwPa0EtcLxbQgiS4zgN5SubZbfDBNPS0zIUyY0tqGoXoi6LUHiK4voflBvcc0QIdb67BthuDfJhFHp4Ilxn1SaIuys23U4SI/7vRMBV04sYPRnbH0tsJLeygUDASTxPyeaGSy/Ve/HWOSBAYg6L5BGrJD3ZBHKTjE4p5jcmRpfGABKq9GdCjS+w==; Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1tW04P-0006P7-Si for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Jan 2025 16:28:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#75368] [PATCH] gnu: coq: Update to 8.20.0. Resent-From: Antero Mejr Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 09 Jan 2025 21:28:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 75368 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: Arnaud Daby-Seesaram Cc: pukkamustard@posteo.net, 75368@debbugs.gnu.org, julien@lepiller.eu Received: via spool by 75368-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B75368.173645807924603 (code B ref 75368); Thu, 09 Jan 2025 21:28:01 +0000 Received: (at 75368) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Jan 2025 21:27:59 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54711 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1tW04M-0006Ol-UC for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 09 Jan 2025 16:27:59 -0500 Received: from sender4-op-o15.zoho.com ([136.143.188.15]:17524) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1tW04K-0006Ob-Oe for 75368@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 09 Jan 2025 16:27:57 -0500 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1736458068; cv=none; d=zohomail.com; s=zohoarc; b=RxPU8AQaE/eWP+vh/fo0XphUfu/n2SdzlA30vdm8iDTdcgjBT2gguFQ13n8d0BpJ8AEf9V1NlO6CSsT7SoctLay4q1pcWJ0h8NMvkByfD/3n+nRQxM/0UQD/RH8Op4WzBWZizgwsDgfrUf+NzowN6agxMYAzh6TJr+oldYb6OTQ= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zohomail.com; s=zohoarc; t=1736458068; h=Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:Cc:Date:Date:From:From:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Message-ID:References:Subject:Subject:To:To:Message-Id:Reply-To; bh=kOj4ay9aiFJuYyhSSfODp2jAInHiJVTj8lYEQEBYuCM=; b=ATAXfyJVUwpLyKYZHyt4gsdjLJ9aHpneXKCAIz/I5nJrXNXjHnZDjEFXP61tE++G8w2m3W7v5QjR5FYYvZ9Qlxo4xBC7LNlfYcI3lJuOs7sjX/J8luuzHORRdayAe/a4/UkE2mdW2LeHvF0nTVvhTJwNXZKhGgclYAVeUzu+fNk= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.zohomail.com; dkim=pass header.i=antr.me; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=mail@antr.me; dmarc=pass header.from= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1736458068; s=zmail; d=antr.me; i=mail@antr.me; h=From:From:To:To:Cc:Cc:Subject:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-Id:Reply-To; bh=kOj4ay9aiFJuYyhSSfODp2jAInHiJVTj8lYEQEBYuCM=; b=BMqQwK8/UDC54tqj3Ydc+r46gck2RHoBHk+3IsaIlG3V1FKP1JAoRTExytiF9ebK g1nLfejVxQZ3XntMYFzwcajVPzYngAjEWm39MiDZhW6sioEoDYRaSJjonj/xkLPCP+4 57adv1mbn24SDP8snw+q0RulVoWSAVMDeUUeYaM8= Received: by mx.zohomail.com with SMTPS id 1736458065659786.6627207659237; Thu, 9 Jan 2025 13:27:45 -0800 (PST) From: Antero Mejr In-Reply-To: <87msg0s4z7.fsf@nanein.fr> (Arnaud Daby-Seesaram's message of "Thu, 09 Jan 2025 10:37:16 +0100") References: <87zfk62i6i.fsf@antr.me> <87msg0s4z7.fsf@nanein.fr> Date: Thu, 09 Jan 2025 16:27:44 -0500 Message-ID: <87cygv65kf.fsf@antr.me> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-ZohoMailClient: External X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Scanner: mx12.migadu.com X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -4.60 X-Spam-Score: -4.60 X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 812BF25D6C X-TUID: z0SLIjBH0+sh Arnaud Daby-Seesaram writes: > Thank you for your patch. I have not had the time to look at it in > detail yet, but here are a few questions/remarks that probably call for > a V2: > > - some Coq-dependent packages are broken by the update (e.g.=C2=A0stdpp n= eeds > to be updated to 1.11.0 to compile). It would be nice to update > dependent packages if they support 8.20. Yes, definitely. Lately I've been wondering if a coq-build-system would be helpful, since it seems there's a lot of commonality/boilerplate in the coq- packages. > - If all Coq packages are updated to support 8.20 (I do not know if it > is possible), would it be worth renaming Coq into Rocq[0]? AFAIK the rename is planned for the 9.0 release, which is still another release away (after 8.21). The rename is going to be a mess. It appears that the packaging system will be changing again, and also we'll have to deprecate all the coq- packages if we want to maintain naming consistency. > - I understand the addition of python in the inputs, as Coq uses python > scripts. However, I do not understand why rsync is added as an input. > Could you say a few words about this? One of the test scripts uses rsync instead of mv to move a file. I chose to add the dependency instead of patching it out. Maybe submitting a patch upstream to fix that would be better. Thanks for the review!