From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: Re: =?utf-8?Q?What=E2=80=99s?= next? Date: Sat, 06 Jul 2013 15:58:00 +0200 Message-ID: <87bo6frdsn.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87li7f28xb.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37247) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UvT4q-0008EJ-Hj for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Jul 2013 10:03:06 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UvT4p-0004jV-4s for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Jul 2013 10:03:04 -0400 Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([141.255.128.1]:53221) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UvT4o-0004jP-Pt for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Jul 2013 10:03:03 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 665C2B37 for ; Sat, 6 Jul 2013 15:58:01 +0200 (CEST) Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hera.aquilenet.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id D1bKQlTuI03c for ; Sat, 6 Jul 2013 15:58:01 +0200 (CEST) Received: from pluto (reverse-83.fdn.fr [80.67.176.83]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 07F2FAC3 for ; Sat, 6 Jul 2013 15:58:00 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <87li7f28xb.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic \=\?utf-8\?Q\?Court\=C3\=A8s\=22'\?\= \=\?utf-8\?Q\?s\?\= message of "Thu, 16 May 2013 00:08:16 +0200") List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: bug-guix@gnu.org Hi! ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) skribis: > So, I think we now want to start working on a bootable distro. > > However, I would add a less ambitious 0.3 milestone, first, ideally to > be released before July. For 0.3, I would like to add actual > cross-compilation support. If everything goes well, that would allow > the MIPS/N64 port to be bootstrap (and perhaps an ARM port too?). 0.3 > would also add interesting packages (GTK+, for instance), and bug fixes. > WDYT? It=E2=80=99s been almost two months since the 0.2 release. We achieved som= e of the important items above (cross-compilation, and cross-compilation of the bootstrap tools); other items are not ready yet (MIPS port, GTK+); there are also bonuses, such as debugging info support. So I would like to merge =E2=80=98core-updates=E2=80=99 soon, and release 0= .3 within one or two weeks. Thoughts? Ludo=E2=80=99.