From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
Subject: Re: Cross bootstrap!
Date: Sat, 06 Jul 2013 23:12:16 +0200
Message-ID: <87bo6fo0jz.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <87txkkanu6.fsf@gnu.org> <87ppv88tiz.fsf@gnu.org>
	<87k3l795pe.fsf@gnu.org> <878v1n4o1g.fsf@karetnikov.org>
	<878v1n74je.fsf@gnu.org> <87txk7v5dd.fsf@karetnikov.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48025)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1UvZr5-00014L-Ju
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Jul 2013 17:17:20 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1UvZr4-0005ZR-Jg
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Jul 2013 17:17:19 -0400
Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([141.255.128.1]:53633)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>)
	id 1UvZr4-0005ZK-DZ
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Jul 2013 17:17:18 -0400
In-Reply-To: <87txk7v5dd.fsf@karetnikov.org> (Nikita Karetnikov's message of
	"Sat, 06 Jul 2013 23:46:22 +0400")
List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix <bug-guix.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/bug-guix>,
	<mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-guix>
List-Post: <mailto:bug-guix@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guix>,
	<mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Nikita Karetnikov <nikita@karetnikov.org>
Cc: bug-guix@gnu.org

Nikita Karetnikov <nikita@karetnikov.org> skribis:

>> Yes.  And if you can get more verbose output than I did with strace,
>> then perhaps we=E2=80=99ll have additional clues.
>
> So, I've just tried to unpack the
> 'guile-static-stripped-2.0.9-mips64el-linux-gnuabi64.tar.xz' tarball and
> run 'strace bin/guile'.  Is it right, or should I also unpack the second
> tarball and specify some variables?

That=E2=80=99s perfect, nothing else to do.

> Is it OK for 'n64_mmap()' to return a negative value?  And what do
> 'SYS_5222' and 'SYS_5223' mean?

So, did strace display the syscall arguments?  (Apparently not, since it
would display an hexadecimal address for mmap.)

> Will it help if we try to open it with GDB?  (This page [1] says that
> GDB should be configured with '--enable-64-bit-bfd'.)

It=E2=80=99s worth trying.  The GDB installed on gcc49.fsffrance.org doesn=
=E2=80=99t
support N64 (same symptom as reported on the web page you linked.)

Thanks,
Ludo=E2=80=99.