From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nikita Karetnikov Subject: Re: 'substitute*' fails with "string contains #\nul character" Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 09:15:44 +0400 Message-ID: <87bo4rfwu7.fsf@karetnikov.org> References: <87zjtpi7vp.fsf@karetnikov.org> <87fvvhfe8f.fsf@gnu.org> <8738rhmb33.fsf@karetnikov.org> <87zjtneb3u.fsf@gnu.org> <87a9lml789.fsf_-_@karetnikov.org> <87y58fkf77.fsf@karetnikov.org> <87li43kzoo.fsf@gnu.org> <87ob8vilrr.fsf@karetnikov.org> <87ob8utzop.fsf@gnu.org> <874nameetw.fsf@karetnikov.org> <87k3ji2adh.fsf@gnu.org> <8738q4yl2t.fsf@karetnikov.org> <8761v0rfkz.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44897) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VC0i2-0001rc-7W for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 01:12:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VC0hv-0005tx-E2 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 01:11:54 -0400 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable >> Another possible solution is to ship our own bootstrap binary (like we >> do with Guile and Bash). But first, I=E2=80=99ll try to patch it. Are = you OK >> with that? > With shipping a binary of GHC? Well, if that=E2=80=99s the only reasonab= le way > to do it, then yes. > GNU/MIT Scheme does that for instance, but that=E2=80=99s =E2=80=9Ctheir > responsibility=E2=80=9D, not ours. Does the GHC project distribute binar= ies for > bootstrapping purposes? Yes. Actually, I=E2=80=99m trying to package a binary version of GHC [1], = but I was talking about shipping =E2=80=98ghc-cabal=E2=80=99. Again, I think that patching is a better solution. [1] http://www.haskell.org/ghc/dist/7.0.1/ghc-7.0.1-i386-unknown-linux.tar.= bz2 --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJSFE0DAAoJEM+IQzI9IQ38t1sP/AtDojwUS7oUfytOFmgcznWe FVIqNSVy2G5c/X3m6n5VPtpXV//lFjCNPgZ/3Nr9zZPcaUENPVb6gHFfOmg08X6h 0SJfhQAuuF2tDIuCIixYKCaR1/CC0Oromi/6iVcw7qnEOyXOltERwL9dZxSjZbPN qtVPuj5+aUT9YH/gLbZEiRceXI/wNY2z3162ya6CPqFklMCNjDxqLVrJBkIH0swH nDzpHl/8NToJ4IGl4idin+yQ4T6m/yw0BJk2OQIeEmTe4InS81bYFXhtUkkrYORi Urh+rWa+vpmJAc2NiAO30gloC4K2uHEg96rEGU9rfH4N/sSmgpKkMiRBC1TjHksC cp/XMPu5w+wH/0HGB0cUg/6rPKCQ6Esq0wDWkxEEmjFATDkjHwYqAj9xgUU12hwj nrIpu9n762kuoGVIeTHDXUq9l9K+fqSOq+8Pnje7oFgKqpFM5NZLjNLrkfmHG0tX 6iTn6cqUIbgzpJa4xg+udp1IEnUP2dd1qvP1FTI1MDX7ixaeSnWYc1R+KutZyyit sVHpXOsutUUGLaBLQZiLIqIzcGls36UogswgDIA2syQTXJBtYVbj+o6lCJFhjWmW bUjs5xHwXg/D6kZVbgdSTXWoiAC3ePmqSrLX0Fgo6C+OpbDZoprr9djsUJJibzQt DJUd2EP0aBi5x947/auU =XHzs -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--