From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: Re: [PATCH] profiles: Report about upgrades. Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2014 21:57:32 +0200 Message-ID: <87bnr04ekz.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87k3719v7p.fsf@gmail.com> <87r419fa50.fsf@gnu.org> <87fvho9fqm.fsf@gmail.com> <87a97taixl.fsf@gmail.com> <87sil2rbly.fsf@gnu.org> <87tx5idn7f.fsf_-_@gmail.com> <87egwlkcy1.fsf@gnu.org> <87ppg5el2i.fsf@gmail.com> <87d2c5h4if.fsf@gnu.org> <87lhqsev1d.fsf@gmail.com> <877g2c74xh.fsf@gnu.org> <87ha1gds3w.fsf@gmail.com> <878umqe1wm.fsf@gmail.com> <87egwgokco.fsf@gnu.org> <87d2bvcqfx.fsf_-_@gmail.com> <87bnr1bvkt.fsf@gnu.org> <87egvxkxey.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53181) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XOBFx-0001aD-Ku for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 31 Aug 2014 15:57:57 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XOBFm-00033v-Vc for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 31 Aug 2014 15:57:45 -0400 Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([2a01:474::1]:52997) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XOBFm-00031V-PL for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 31 Aug 2014 15:57:34 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87egvxkxey.fsf@gmail.com> (Alex Kost's message of "Sun, 31 Aug 2014 10:04:05 +0400") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Alex Kost Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Alex Kost skribis: > But is it correct to report it like that? I mean if a user has > =E2=80=9Cguile-1.8.8=E2=80=9D and installs =E2=80=9Cguile-2.0.9=E2=80=9D = then (with your variant) he > gets: > > The following package will be upgraded: > guile-2.0.9 out /gnu/store/... > > I thought it should be: > > The following package will be upgraded: > guile-1.8.8 out /gnu/store/... > > Actually that's why (to avoid possible confusion) I initially suggested: > > The following package will be upgraded (removed): > guile-1.8.8 out /gnu/store/... > > The following package will be installed: > guile-2.0.9 out /gnu/store/... Oh I see, I had misunderstood the intent. Well, I don=E2=80=99t know what=E2=80=99s best. I=E2=80=99m happy with the= way things are now, though I can see why it could be confusing. Perhaps even a different format, like, say: The following package will be upgraded: guile 1.8.8 =E2=86=92 2.0.9 out /gnu/store/... Thoughts? Ludo=E2=80=99.